Uncertainty in Double-Slit Diffraction

mrjeffy321
Science Advisor
Messages
876
Reaction score
1
I am asked to show that it would be impossible to determine exactly which slit a single photon of light passed through in a double slit diffraction grating without destroying the resulting interference pattern since in order to do so, we would need to know both the momentum and position of the photon to such a degree not allowed by the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle (ΔxΔp would need to be much less than h-bar / 2).

I am not sure how I would go about showing this…I am some-what stuck as to where to start.

I know the momentum of the photon is: p = h / λ.
To get a interference pattern, the size of the slits need to be roughly on the same order as the wavelength of the light. If we know the slits are on the same order as the wavelength of the light and in order for a photon to pass through either one slit or the other we would need to know the photon’s position on this same scale. But what about momentum? We know the photon needs to be traveling in the direction of the screen (not backwards), but this is not a very constraining piece of knowledge.

Once I get a sense of the sizes of Δx and Δp, I need to show that this is << h-bar / 2. And then from the uncertainty principle we know this is impossible, so that means that we cannot know which slit the photon passes through without destroying the interference pattern.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top