Uncertainty Principle of a high speed particle

Misha Kuznetsov
Messages
49
Reaction score
4
Hello everyone,
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle states that the less uncertainty there is of a particles position, the more uncertainty there has to be of its momentum. Since mass is a constant in this case, we can refer to the uncertainty of the velocity instead. I was reading a physics book, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, and it mentioned, "if we try to pin down a particle by forcing it to be at a particular place, it ends up by having a high speed."

My question is, what does high speed of a particle have to do with the uncertainty of its velocity? Is it that it is more difficult to precisely measure the velocity of a particle at high speeds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Misha Kuznetsov said:
My question is, what does high speed of a particle have to do with the uncertainty of its velocity? Is it that it is more difficult to precisely measure the velocity of a particle at high speeds?

A high uncertainty means that if you measure the speed many times (more precisely, you repeat the experiment from the beginning many times, making one measurement each time) you'll get a wide range of values. The average of these values has to be far from zero, as otherwise the range wouldn't be wide. Thus, if you measure the speed, you expect to get a value that is far from zero... and that's a high speed.
 
Okay, I think I understand now. Is there a wide range of values for the speed because adding many waves of various wavelengths yields one that is more localized, but its momentum (wavelength) becomes spread out and less constant? And so when you measure many times, you find the wavelength from different waves each time?
 
Misha Kuznetsov said:
Okay, I think I understand now. Is there a wide range of values for the speed because adding many waves of various wavelengths yields one that is more localized, but its momentum (wavelength) becomes spread out and less constant? And so when you measure many times, you find the wavelength from different waves each time?

Yes, that's pretty much how the math works out when you use the basic formalism of wave mechanics and the Schrodinger equation in the position and momentum bases - transform a position wave function with a steep peak around one location to the momentum basis and you get a wide flat shape and vice versa.
 
Thank you so much, that helped a lot. :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top