Uncertainty relation: minimum value

fluxions
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the smallest possible uncertainty in the position of an electron whose speed is given by \beta = v/c is \Delta x_{min} = \frac{h}{4 \pi m_0 c}\sqrt{1-\beta^2}

The Attempt at a Solution


Since \Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}, we see that \Delta x_{min} occurs when \Delta p has its greatest value.

Relativistically, \Delta p is:
\Delta p = \Delta ( \frac{m_0 v}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}}) = ... = (1-\beta^2)^{-3/2} m_0 \Delta vNow the greatest value of \Delta p occurs when \Delta v is c.

Hence
\Delta x_{min} = \frac{h}{4 \pi m_0 c} (1 - \beta^2)^{3/2}.

My exponent for gamma is incorrect. Where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
fluxions said:
\Delta p = \Delta ( \frac{m_0 v}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}}) = ... = (1-\beta^2)^{-3/2} m_0 \Delta v

You can apply this only when \Delta v is very small. Here you set \Delta v = c, not small at all! In this case, v_{max}=c and v_{min}=0, which correspond to p = infinity (!) and p = 0 respectively. Obviously \Delta p = infinity, which results in \Delta x = 0, and that's not what we want. Therefore I think that we should reconsider the assumption that the electron may reach to v=c.

I don't get the needed result, but let me present my opinion and see if we can proceed from that. Assume that the electron is free electron (it's free from any potential field). Due to the law of energy conservation, its kinetic energy cannot increase, so v = const and thus |\vec{p}| = const.

However momentum \vec{p} may point to any direction, which leads to the fact that p_x varies. Since p=const, the largest uncertainty of p_x is: max(\Delta p_x) = 2p. Thus: min(\Delta x)=\frac{h}{4\pi m_o v}\sqrt{1-\beta^2}.
 
hikaru1221 said:
You can apply this only when \Delta v is very small. Here you set \Delta v = c, not small at all! In this case, v_{max}=c and v_{min}=0, which correspond to p = infinity (!) and p = 0 respectively. Obviously \Delta p = infinity, which results in \Delta x = 0, and that's not what we want. Therefore I think that we should reconsider the assumption that the electron may reach to v=c.

Oops. Yeah, my approximation is definitely not justified; I feel rather silly for using it.

[/QUOTE]
I don't get the needed result, but let me present my opinion and see if we can proceed from that. Assume that the electron is free electron (it's free from any potential field). Due to the law of energy conservation, its kinetic energy cannot increase, so v = const and thus |\vec{p}| = const.

However momentum \vec{p} may point to any direction, which leads to the fact that p_x varies. Since p=const, the largest uncertainty of p_x is: max(\Delta p_x) = 2p. Thus: min(\Delta x)=\frac{h}{4\pi m_o v}\sqrt{1-\beta^2}.[/QUOTE]

Ok, I agree with your analysis for the most part.max(\Delta p_x) = 2p holds for each value of p, hence v. We can take the max (supremum, actually, since v cannot equal c) of this max by sending v to c. This gives the desired result.
 
fluxions said:
Ok, I agree with your analysis for the most part.max(\Delta p_x) = 2p holds for each value of p, hence v. We can take the max (supremum, actually, since v cannot equal c) of this max by sending v to c. This gives the desired result.

That may be a good estimation :rolleyes:
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top