Uncertainty Relations & Wave Packets

AI Thread Summary
Laser pulses of femtosecond duration challenge the concept of 'color' due to their broad frequency range, specifically covering the entire visible spectrum from 4.0*10^14 Hz to 7.5*10^14 Hz. The uncertainty relation is applied to calculate the time duration of the pulse, leading to a derived time of approximately 4.55*10^-16 seconds. There is a discrepancy noted between the professor's slide, which states ΔwΔt=2π, and the textbook's assertion of ΔwΔt=1, with the latter being favored for calculations. It's emphasized that beyond just computing the time, one should also reflect on the significance of the result in the context of the problem. Properly addressing the implications of the calculation is crucial for a complete understanding.
Pi Face
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
PROBLEM:
Laser pulses of femptosecond duration can be produced, but for such brief pulses it
makes no sense to speak of the ‘color’ of the laser. To demonstrate this, compute the time duration of a laser pulse whose range of frequencies covers the entire visible spectrum (4.0*10^14 Hz to 7.5*10^14 Hz).

WORK:
I know I need to use the uncertainty relation for this problem, but in one of my prof's slides it says ΔwΔt=2π but in my textbook it says ΔwΔt=1. I'm siding with the textbook and hoping the slide just had a typo, does that seem correct?

Assuming ΔwΔt=1, w=2πf so 2πΔfΔt=1, and ΔfΔt=1/(2π). Because we are asked to calculate time, Δt=1/(2πΔf)
Δf=7.5*10^14 Hz - 4.0*10^14 Hz = 3.5*10^14 Hz
then,
Δt=1/(2π*3.5*10^14 Hz) = 4.55*10^-16 s

Is that all I have to do? The question is kinda long for such little work so I'm not sure if I'm missing something. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in one of my prof's slides it says ΔwΔt=2π but in my textbook it says ΔwΔt=1. I'm siding with the textbook and hoping the slide just had a typo, does that seem correct?
You can see for yourself by considering where the relation comes from.
Is that all I have to do? The question is kinda long for such little work so I'm not sure if I'm missing something. Thanks.
You do have a bit more work to do ... what was the purpose of doing the calculation? Has it fulfilled it's purpose?

In general, you should always comment on the results of any long-answer question: don't just leave the number hanging like that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top