Uncovering the Mystery of Mass Gain in Special Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ralphonsicus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
Ralphonsicus
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
As objects approach the speed of light, according to Special Relativity, they gain mass. But when this happens, what does the mass come in the form of?

The first thing that comes to mind would be matter and antimatter. But if this is so, wouldn't they just annihilate, and do so in a fury as more matter and antimatter are added to the object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It isn't really the MASS that increases, it is the mass-energy, and the increase comes from the energy expended in causing the acceleration.
 
The mass gain is what the observer sees resulting from the energy put into the particle to make it speed up. In the frame of the particle itself, the mass is unchanged.
 
It doesn't "come from" anything. In my experience it's really not even all that common to talk about relativistic mass, we usually just write energy in terms of rest mass (which is invariant). It's a bit of a misleading concept anyway, because it implies (as you seem to have the impression) that it is related to some internal change in the object -- it's not.

It more or less comes from the fact that mass-energy (rest mass, that is) can be written E_{0} = mc^{2}

For a particle moving relative to an observer, the energy of the particle would be measured by the observer to be E = \gamma mc^{2}

Thus you can write m_{rel} = \frac{E}{c^2} = \gamma m, where m is the rest mass, equating E_{0} with E but again, it's kind of an ambiguous and misleading concept.
 
mathman said:
The mass gain is what the observer sees resulting from the energy put into the particle to make it speed up.
That concept of a "relativistic mass" is not used any more in physics - it just remains in old textbooks and bad web pages.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top