Underdamped motion (Formula deriving)

  • Thread starter Thread starter noppawit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving Motion
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 6K views
noppawit
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to derive the equation of motion of underdamped motion.


Homework Equations


From [tex]F = m\ddot{x}[/tex]
[tex]-kx - c\dot{x} = m\ddot{x}[/tex]
[tex]m\ddot{x} + c\dot{x} + kx = 0[/tex]

[tex]x_{h}(t) = ae^{\lambda t}[/tex]
[tex]\dot{x}(t) = \lambda ae^{\lambda t}[/tex]
[tex]\ddot{x}(t) = \lambda^2 ae^{\lambda t}[/tex]

Therefore, for underdamped: [tex]\lambda = -\zeta\omega_{n} \pm i\sqrt{1-\zeta^{2}}[/tex]
[tex]x_{h}(t) = a_{1}e^{(-\zeta\omega_{n} + i\sqrt{1-\zeta^{2}}) t} + a_{2}e^{(-\zeta\omega_{n} - i\sqrt{1-\zeta^{2}}) t}[/tex]
[tex]x_{h}(t) = e^{-\zeta\omega_{n} t}(a_{1}e^{i\sqrt{1-\zeta^{2}}) t} + a_{2}e^{- i\sqrt{1-\zeta^{2}}) t})[/tex] <---- From here (1)
[tex]x_{h}(t) = e^{-\zeta\omega_{n} t}(A sin(\omega_{n}t + \phi))[/tex] <---- To here (2)

From (1) to (2), how can it become like that? I tried from Euler Equation that [tex]e^{i\theta} = cos(\theta) + i sin(\theta)[/tex], but I still cannot derive from (1) to (2)

P.S.[tex]\omega_{d}[/tex] is damped natural frequency.

Noppawit
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi noppawit! :smile:

Peix + Qe-ix

= ((P+Q)/2)cosx + i((P-Q)/2)sinx …

since we know the solution must be real, we can assume P+Q and i(P-Q) are real,

so this is in the form Rsinx + Scosx, which we can rewrite as √(R2 + S2)sin(x + tan-1S/R) :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi noppawit! :smile:

Peix + Qe-ix

= ((P+Q)/2)cosx + i((P-Q)/2)sinx …

since we know the solution must be real, we can assume P+Q and i(P-Q) are real,

so this is in the form Rsinx + Scosx, which we can rewrite as √(R2 + S2)sin(x + tan-1S/R) :wink:

Thank you :)