Undergrad, Grad, Postdoc, Tenure Stream

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the significant attrition rates in physics and math programs, noting that only a small fraction of students who begin as undergraduates will complete their B.Sc. and progress to Ph.D. levels. Factors such as dedication, persistence, and the ability to cope with competition are crucial for success in these fields. The current academic landscape shows a preference for hiring international candidates, as many U.S. students struggle to meet the qualifications for advanced degrees. Funding initiatives like NSF's VIGRE program aim to support U.S. students in graduate math programs, addressing the disparity in preparedness compared to their international peers. Overall, there is a growing emphasis on improving access and support for U.S. students pursuing advanced degrees in math and related disciplines.
Manicwhale
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How many people out of the original number entering as a physics or physics/math undergrad (overall, not at any specific university) will:

1. Get their B.Sc.?
2. Get their Ph.D.?
3. Become a PostDoc, or stay in the academic stream in some way?
4. Become a professor?
5. Become a tenure stream professor?

In other words, what are the chances of reaching each stage? Feel free to add more stages if you feel they are appropriate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i have no idea. when i was a freshman math major at harvard in 1960, there were 110 roughly students in my fall honors calculus class. there were about half that many in the second semester, and i heard something like a handful finished as math majors.

i myself got a D- in 2nd semester and only returned to the fold much later. It required far more than mere smarts, everyone had that,... it took desire, dedication, persistence, and good study habits [ i mean every day], and ability to accept how many really smart people are out there, and how many of them are in math, and to accept whatever ones own place among them may turn out to be. obviously not all the high school valedictorians are going to be that in college. and all the state math champs from here to there who cannot accept being in the middle of the pack at univ, drop away. those who only want to be first, instead of learn the subject, often give up for an easier path.

this was 40+ years ago, but is similar to my elder son's experience in the 1990's at stanford. many schools today try very hard to keep more majors, but there is a strong temptation for students to major in something far easier. some of them say "i can get an A with half the work in another subject". maybe so. but...then what ?

there is a reason most new profs hired in math in US today are from other countries - Russia, Romania, Iran, China, Korea, Canada, Croatia, Italy, Spain, ...
 
Last edited:
a positive aspect for interested parties nowadays is the desire of the funding agencies to increase the number of US citizens obtaoning these degrees. There is a program at NSF funded by millions of dollars called VIGRE, which provides good stipends for US stiudents who go into grad programs in math. This enables math departments who have these grants, to admit many more students than before and to pay them better and give them less teaching duties.

This enables US students, often with weaker backgrounds than their foreign counterparts, to have an advantage in these US programs. It gives them an edge in admissions and a more advantageous situation for doing their work.

In short there is a buyers market in many graduate math programs in US today as it is hard to find US citizens who are qualified to complete Phd in math. So this is a good time to be looking for this degree. as the programs are offering as much help as possible to students who might not have been considered qualified in the past. Graduate progrms are creating "remedial" graduate entry level courses to bring US math majors up to speed. This targets talented people who attended schools where the course work was below standard.

Just the opposite obtained in the late 1970's when some universities kicked out students right and left because of a perceived glut of phD's.
 
Last edited:
For a broad survey that includes other sciences and engineers (which may or may not be useful to you), see this study:

http://www.urban.org/publications/411562.html
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top