Schools Undergrad research for astronomy grad school

AI Thread Summary
Research experience is important for undergraduates aiming for graduate school in astronomy, but the specific type of research—whether in astronomy or physics—holds less significance than gaining hands-on experience. Physics research is often more accessible due to its prevalence, and this experience is considered valuable for developing a realistic understanding of research processes. The application process for graduate schools in the U.S. focuses on the overall research experience rather than the specific field, making physics research just as relevant as astronomy research. Matching the type of research to future interests may be beneficial, but it is not a critical factor at the application stage.
torquemada
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
hi - does it matter if you do research or not in astronomy as an undergrad? is it ok to just do undergrad physics research for astronomy grad school? does it look any better to do astronomy research versus physics research as an undergrad, or any physics will do? I'm asking as a matter of practicality because physics is the undergrad major for many grad students in astronomy and obviously there are many more opportunities for undergrad research in physics versus astronomy, due to the former being more prevalent than the latter. thank you for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not from the US and not familiar with the system there. But I think the reason why research experience is seen as something valuable for undergrads is because they have hands-on experience of what research is like, and that they have at least some realistic viewpoint of it. I don't think anyone expects that in undergrad research you gain deep and valuable insights into the field that will benefit the later research group you work in during PhD research and lead it to great achievements.
Based on this I am pretty sure that physics research experience is just as valuable as astronomy research experience. Matching the type of research (lab work, computer analysis, or analytical calculations) may be slightly more important, but if I understand it correctly then in the US you are applying for "grad schools", not for "PhD positions", so at the time of application you don't even know what kind of work you'll be doing later - making this potential point irrelevant.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
82
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
950
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top