Undergraduate Research: Weighing the Options

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the perceived safety and future prospects of various scientific fields, particularly biology, life sciences, medical sciences, and high-energy physics. Participants express that while funding for biology and related fields is increasing, high-energy physics is facing significant cuts. The notion of a "safer future" is debated, with emphasis on job security and the importance of individual capability over the field itself. The conversation highlights that success in any field is not guaranteed and may depend on current trends and personal career aspirations, whether in academic research, teaching, or industry roles. The long-term outlook on job security and field viability is also considered, referencing the unpredictability of future developments in science.

which field will guarantee a safer future??

  • Condensed matter physics

    Votes: 4 23.5%
  • High energy physics

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Nuclear physics

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nanoscience

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Bio/Medical physics

    Votes: 11 64.7%
  • Physical Acoustics

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Astronomy/astrophysics

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Theoritical physics

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
rukshan
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Please tell your opinion with reasons (if possible). I hope this will be important for those who do not have a good undergrad research experience

Please consider all the factors including the demand, funding, research, jobs,...etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Safer future"... in what sense? for whom? over what period?...
 
All the news I'm hearing is that funding for biology, life sciences, and the medical sciences is way up. Interestingly, the only other vote in the poll right now is for high-energy physics, an area that's getting funding slash in a huge way right now (in the U.S.).
 
Safer as in, job security? Thats what I'm guessing. If something else, I'll have to change my vote ;)
 
I would say that none of those fields "guarantees a safer future" for job security.
It's not so much the field... but your ability to succeed in that field... but nothing is guaranteed.

Maybe your question is more about "what's hot [fashionable] now"?

In what capacity do you want to work in that field?
Academic Research, Academic Teaching, Corporate Research, Industry, ...?
When [how long from now] will be you be in that position?
 
Feynman was once asked to comment on the future of physics. He chose an extremely long time period, one which he would not live to see. He was not shy to state his reason which was that he knew he would certainly be wrong and people would be there to point it out if it was during his lifetime.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top