Understand Mandl & Shaw's Derivation of Moller Scattering

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Mandl and Shaw's derivation of the S-operator affecting Moller scattering, specifically analyzing the second term in the Dyson series expansion. The relevant expression for the S-matrix is given as S(2e^-\to 2e^-) = -\frac{e^2}{2!} \iint d^4x_1 d^4x_2 : (\bar{\psi}^-\gamma^\alpha\psi^+)_{x_1}(\bar{\psi}^-\gamma^\beta \psi^+)_{x_2}:\mathrm{i} D_{\mathrm{F}\alpha\beta}(x_1 -x_2). The discussion highlights the derivation's complexity, particularly in understanding the emergence of four contributions to the Moller transition due to the indistinguishability of fermions in the initial and final Fock states. The participant expresses uncertainty regarding the negative sign in the prefactor of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly the S-matrix and Dyson series.
  • Familiarity with Wick's theorem and its application in quantum electrodynamics.
  • Knowledge of Feynman propagators and their role in particle interactions.
  • Basic grasp of fermionic statistics and the implications of identical particles in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Wick's theorem in quantum field theory.
  • Learn about the derivation and implications of the Dyson series in quantum electrodynamics.
  • Investigate the properties of Feynman propagators in particle physics.
  • Explore the concept of indistinguishable particles and its effects on scattering processes.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in advanced quantum field theory, particularly those focusing on scattering processes and particle interactions.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to understand Mandl and Shaw's derivation of the part of the S-operator which affects Moller scattering.

Starting with the second term in the Dyson series expansion for the S-matrix, they extract using Wick's theorem the term with a contracted electromagnetic field and four uncontracted fermion fields.

Then using the fact that two electrons must be annihilated and then created they conclude that the relevant term is

S(2e^-\to 2e^-) = -\frac{e^2}{2!} \iint d^4x_1 d^4x_2 : (\bar{\psi}^-\gamma^\alpha\psi^+)_{x_1}(\bar{\psi}^-\gamma^\beta \psi^+)_{x_2}:\mathrm{i} D_{\mathrm{F}\alpha\beta}(x_1 -x_2)

where D_F is the Feynman propagator representing transmission of a virtual photon between the spacetime points x_1 and x_2.

Now here comes the tricky bit. They claim that the above expression gives four contributions to the Moller transition since each initial (final) electron (positron) can be annihilated (created) by either of the \psi^+ (\psi^-) operators.

I'm having trouble seeing why we should get four terms out of this. If we sandwich S(2e^-\to 2e^-) between initial and final Fock states, how can this result in a sum of four terms mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm slowly working my way towards a resolution of this problem.

I am pretty sure it is to do with the fact that the initial and final Fock states consist of linear superpositions because of the fact that the fermions are identical e.g.

|initial\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|p_1\rangle p_2\rangle - |p_2 \rangle p_1\rangle).

So far I have not been able to account for the minus sign prefactor in the first term on the RHS of equation (7.18).
 
After a lot of anguish, I managed to get Mandl and Shaw's (7.18) to within an overall phase factor of negative one. Could this be an error in the text?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K