Understand Vector Potential A Physically: Proof of E = ∂A/∂t - ∇φ

AI Thread Summary
Vector potential A is primarily a mathematical construct in electromagnetism, introduced to create a symmetrical formulation of the theory. Its curl yields the magnetic field B, while the relationship E = ∂A/∂t - ∇φ connects it to the electric field E. The physical significance of A is debated, with some suggesting it lacks direct physical meaning and serves mainly as a gauge field. Resources like Maxwell's Equations and related online articles can provide further insights and proofs regarding these relationships. Understanding A's role can enhance comprehension of electromagnetic field theory.
captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
i am having trouble visualiszing what vector potential A means physically. I understand that if you take the curl of it it give you the magnetic field B. I was wondering if anybody could also direct me to a website or show me a proof of how the electric field E is equal to the partial derivative of A with respect to time minus the grad of the scalar potential. I have no clue where to find that proof and neither do i possesses a textbook that has the proof in it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
captain said:
i am having trouble visualiszing what vector potential A means physically. I understand that if you take the curl of it it give you the magnetic field B. I was wondering if anybody could also direct me to a website or show me a proof of how the electric field E is equal to the partial derivative of A with respect to time minus the grad of the scalar potential. I have no clue where to find that proof and neither do i possesses a textbook that has the proof in it.

I still don't understand the physical significance of A. My teacher told me there wasn't really one... it was just a mathematical relationship. Anyway, it seems to be in the same direction the E field that gets induced by the B field (which may or may not be induced by an original field, E1)


how E = dA/dt:

use Maxwell's Equations, maybe the divergence theorem or one of those other integral forms... I'm having deja vu:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations
 
Pythagorean said:
I still don't understand the physical significance of A. My teacher told me there wasn't really one... it was just a mathematical relationship.
Your teacher is right on this one. The A-potential is introduced in the EM formalism to write the theory in a symmetrical way. It makes the step towards field theory more logic in the sense that the A field plays the role of the EM gauge field. Also, this potential is used to impose gauge-conditions to set the remaining degree of freedom that arises due to the definition of the A-field.

More here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_potential

marlon

edit : you should also wonder about the question why they call the A field a POTENTIAL ! :wink: (hint : look at the definition of the scalar potential)
 
Last edited:
Pythagorean said:
I still don't understand the physical significance of A. My teacher told me there wasn't really one... it was just a mathematical relationship. Anyway, it seems to be in the same direction the E field that gets induced by the B field (which may or may not be induced by an original field, E1)


how E = dA/dt:

use Maxwell's Equations, maybe the divergence theorem or one of those other integral forms... I'm having deja vu:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations[/QUOTE]

so can i think of A as being a field who's rate of rotation equals the magnetic field and who's field velocity is equal to the electrical field.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top