Understanding Angular Displacement in Weakly Damped Harmonic Oscillators

AI Thread Summary
In weakly damped harmonic oscillators driven by sinusoidal forces, the differential equation of motion is expressed as ma + cv + kx = Fe^(iwt). The solution involves angular displacement (y) as a function of angular velocity (w), derived from the equation tan(y) = 2uw / (W^2 - w^2), where W represents the undamped angular velocity. The discussion clarifies that y is not an independent variable but rather a phase shift that relates the driving force to the oscillation. The dependency of angular displacement on angular velocity arises from the nature of the system's response to external forces. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of oscillatory systems.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Hey PF. This isn't a homework question and I'm hoping this is the right place to ask it, sorry if it isn't!

In the case of a weakly damped harmonic oscillator driven by a sinusoidal force of the form Fe^(iwt). The form of the differential force equation of motion is then given by ma + cv +kx = Fe^(iwt).

The solution to this equation is given as x=Ae^i(wt-y) where y is angular displacement (analogous to theta). We then solve for v and a and plug the values into the force equation and proceeding to set the real and imaginary parts of said force equation equal to each other and then diving those equations by one another.

The result, using the supstitution of c = 2um where m is mass and u is a variable that scales proportionally to the drag coefficient (which is c), can take the form of giving y ( angular deplacement) as a function of angular velocity (w). The equation looks like this:

tan(y) = 2uw / (W^2 - w^2) where W is the undamped nondriven angular velocity given by the equation (k/m)^(1/2) and w is the angular velocity term from the driven force and solution to the differential equation.

Okay... I hope I explained that well enough.. Hoping someone out there is smart enough to know what I'm talking about even though I don't know what I'm talking about lol...

Anyhoo, my question is with understanding the equation. why is y (angular displacement) dependent on the angular velocity at all? Wouldn't angular displacement be a stand alone variable? The way we derived the equation of angular displacement as a function of angler velocity was having the angular displacement term originally take the form of the initial displacement. Why is this dependent on w!? How is it not a stand alone variable? Sorry if this was really repetitive trying to be as clear as possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you denote by ##y## is the phase shift between the driving force and the resultant oscillation. It is not a variable, because it is constant..
 
Oh, duh, thanks.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top