Understanding Basis Choices in Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Verdict
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
Verdict
Messages
114
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Alright, so this is not exactly a guided homework question. It is a rather intricate problem consisting of many steps, but one of these steps comes down to working out the hyperfine interaction between two spin 1 particles, from a hamiltonian point of view. From what I have been given, in this particular setup it can be simplified to the equation below:

Homework Equations


H = A S_{z}⊗I_{z}

where S and Z are angular momentum operators corresponding to the Z axis.

The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, so my problem is how I go about knowing which column of each matrix correspons to what. Does the first column correspond to the spin being 0, 1 or -1, basically. I have illustrated my question with the picture below, working out a specific case, where I indicate the spin of the first particle by mS and the spin of the second particle by mI. The reason for why the ordering is important to me is because I want to perform an experiment in which I have to be able to distinguish between the second particle being spin 1, 0 or -1, and the only way I can think of doing so in my specific setup is if I know which values of the hamiltonian correspond to which combination of (spin particle 1, spin particle 2)

2z6zbqa.jpg


Somehow I seem to remember that this choice of basis is arbitrary, which means that no specific one corresponds to spin 1, 0, or -1. This would be problematic, as I need a clear way to distinguish them from one another.

Edit: I understand that my question is a bit vague. It basically boils down to if the numbers I put under the matrix are set, or if they can be chosen arbitrarily.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand where you are going with this. By if you have hyperfine interaction, then ##m_S## and ##m_I## are no longer good quantum numbers and cannot be used to describe eigenstates of the system.
 
Hmm. Well, I suppose I should have added more context, as looking back at it it is indeed not clear at all what I am trying to say. In the end my question boiled down to which eigenvectors corresponded to what columns of the pauli matrices for a spin 1 particle, which is easily answered. But thank you for giving my question some thought, and I apologize for wasting your time!
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top