Understanding Bounded Operators in Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter tommy01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Operators
tommy01
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
hi.

i'm reading "quantum mechanics in hilbert space" and a don't get a basic point for bounded operators.

def. 1 a set S in a normed space N is bounded if there is a constant C such that \left\| f \right\| \leq C ~~~~~ \forall f \in S

def. 2 a transformation is called bounded if it maps each bounded set into a bounded set.

and now comes the part i don't understand.

for linear operators T: N_1 \rightarrow N_2 def. 2 is equivalent to:
there exists a constant C such that \left\| T f \right\| \leq C \left\| f \right\| ~~~~~ \forall f \in N_1

this is stated without a proof. i don't think it's obvious or at least not to me.

i'm thinking of a map, for example from the real numbers (normed space) to the real numbers, where the bounded set N_1=(0,1] is transformed in a way to another interval say N_2=(a,b] now the norm of elements from N_1 can get arbitrary small. So there can't exist a constant fulfilling \left\| T f \right\| \leq C \left\| f \right\| ~~~~~ \forall f \in N_1 when the norm of all elements of N_2 has a lower bound say m>0.

Or is such a map forbidden because of the continuity (zero has to be mapped on zero) and bounded linerar operators are continuous and vice verca?

i would be glad if someone can show me a proof or a source where a can get one.

thanks and greetings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clearly, the '<=' implication is true. For suppose that ||Tf|| <= C ||f||. Take N1 to be a bounded set. That means that for all f, ||f|| <= C' for some constant C'. So clearly, ||Tf|| <= C C' where the right hand side is again a constant.

As for the direct implication '=>' ... I didn't quite see it right away. How to connect the statement about bounded sets to a statement about any subset of S eludes me right now. If I think of something I will let you know :)
 
Suppose that T takes bounded sets to bounded sets. The set of all vectors of the form \frac{f}{\|f\|} is bounded, so there must exist a C such that

\|T\frac{f}{\|f\|}\|\leq C

This implies \|Tf\|\leq C\|f\|.

To prove the converse, suppose instead that there exists a C such that \|Tf\|\leq C\|f\| for all f, and let B be a bounded set with bound M (i.e. \|g\|\leq M for all g in B). We need to show that there exists an upper bound for the set of all \|Tg\| with g in B.

\|Tg\|\leq C\|g\|\leq CM

If you're also wondering why an operator is continuous if and only if it's bounded, the Wikipedia page titled "bounded operator" has a very nice proof of that.
 
Great!

Many thanks to both of you.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top