Understanding Calculation of N (Number of Atoms)

  • Thread starter Thread starter KiNGGeexD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Calculation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the number of atoms (N) in a given context, specifically related to moles and density. It clarifies that 28 grams corresponds to one mole, leading to a volume calculation of 35 cm³ per mole based on a density of 0.81 g/cm³. The participants confirm that N is equivalent to Avogadro's number in this context, which is essential for converting between moles and individual molecules. There is also a mention of a calculation yielding 1.95E-21 J, indicating a potential rounding in the process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the relationship between moles, volume, and the number of atoms in calculations.
KiNGGeexD
Messages
317
Reaction score
1
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1395008862.765744.jpg


I was looking through my notes and came across this (above) I understand the calculation etc but I don't see where the number of atoms N was calculated?

I don't see where it has come fromAny help would be great thanks in advanced
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neat handwriting you are using to produce your notes...not nice you (they?) break the line between the minus sign and the 23, though...

28 gram is one mole
density is 0.81 g/cm3
so 28 gram is 28/0.81 = 35 cm3, right ? i.e. 35 cm3/mole

one mole is N_avogadro molecules and 35/(6 e23) = 5.8 e-23 cm3/molecule.

Take the ##\root 3 \of \ ## and you get something like 3.9 e-8 cm or 0.39 nm
 
It's the top calculation for latent heat I'm not sure about I get the surface tension one, but the one above makes no mention of N but must use it:)
 
Why don't you type the part of "your" notes that you have a question about ? I can hardly read what is to the left of ##{1\over 2} nN\epsilon##. Anyway, since we are talking J/mol, N=NA.
 
Would N in the top equation not be just Avergadros number?
 
Yes. Since we are talking J/mol, N=NA.
 
Ahh ok this calculation must just be rounded up because using avergadros number just now I obtained

1.95E-21 J

Thanks
 
Back
Top