Understanding Cell Arrangement in Laptop Battery Rebuilding

  • Thread starter Thread starter cadaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery Laptop
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rebuilding a laptop battery using six 3.7V 1800 mAh Li-Ion cells. Participants clarify the voltage outputs, noting that the battery's total voltage should be around 11.1V, not 14.8V, which suggests a misunderstanding of the cell arrangement. It is explained that VM and VH are likely used for balancing the cells, with specific voltage readings expected between cells in series. The importance of monitoring individual cell voltages to prevent undercharging or overcharging is emphasized. Understanding the arrangement and voltage readings is crucial for successful battery rebuilding.
cadaver
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I am in the process of rebuilding my laptop battery for higher capacity cells. I would appreciate it if someone can help me understand the arrangement of the cells. From my research, each cell is 3.7V 1800 mAH Li-Ion cells. There are 6 of them in the battery pack. In this arrangement:


Untitled.png


I will guess and say that the VP is receiving 7.4v and VG is the ground. But why is VH and VM receiving both positive and ground of 14.8v? And what do they stand for?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
cadaver said:
So I am in the process of rebuilding my laptop battery for higher capacity cells. I would appreciate it if someone can help me understand the arrangement of the cells. From my research, each cell is 3.7V 1800 mAH Li-Ion cells. There are 6 of them in the battery pack. In this arrangement:


View attachment 36565

I will guess and say that the VP is receiving 7.4v and VG is the ground. But why is VH and VM receiving both positive and ground of 14.8v? And what do they stand for?

I think you should redraw the circuit on paper so its easier to understand, you should see what's going on better.
 
It is exactly how I drew it on the image above. From what I see in the battery case, there are wires going from the battery terminals to VH, VM, VP, VG which are solder points on the circuit board. I'm just trying to figure out how can one input receive both + and - ?
 
pardon me for posting to an old thread, but i came across this in a search...

i'm a little confused by your diagram. i don't understand how it would be putting out 14.8v. if your battery is putting out 14.8v i would think you have 4 cells, or pairs wired in parallel then, wired in series (4 * 3.7 = 14.8) do you mean 11.1v?

VM & VH would be used for balancing afaik. if it's an 11.1v battery, VM would be between the first and second cell(s) in series, and would read 3.7v. VH would be between the second and third, and would read 7.4v. then measuring the VP (B+) you would see 11.1v.

those numbers would be appox. if an individual cell is below 2.8-3.0v it's possibly undercharged. above 4.2-4.3v it's possibly overcharged. so you may be getting a slightly different voltage reading.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top