Understanding Coherent Interaction in Dicke Model

lfqm
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Hi! I would really appreciate you to help me answer this question:

What is the physical meaning of coherent interaction (in the Dicke model for example)?

I mean, coherence is well defined in classical optics, but what does it means when you ask for a system of N atomic dipoles to interact coherently with an electromagnetic field? :confused:

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure but I suppose it means that the N dipoles are all interacting with the field while in phase with each other.

I don't know about the Dicke model, as I'm struggling to understand Dickes papers, but for a system interacting with field :
E=A cos(kx-ωt)
Assume that the wavelength of E is large enough that all N dipoles see ~ the same E,
so
E=A cos(ωt)
Then coherent if the response of the dipoles is the same and has the same time evolution,
Dipole 1 has moment
P1 = e cos(ωt)
Same as dipole 2
P2= e cos(ωt)
If they interacted incoherently then
P2= e cos(ωt + p(t))
Where p(t) is some time varying phase difference in the dipoles responce.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top