Understanding Coherent Interaction in Dicke Model

lfqm
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Hi! I would really appreciate you to help me answer this question:

What is the physical meaning of coherent interaction (in the Dicke model for example)?

I mean, coherence is well defined in classical optics, but what does it means when you ask for a system of N atomic dipoles to interact coherently with an electromagnetic field? :confused:

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure but I suppose it means that the N dipoles are all interacting with the field while in phase with each other.

I don't know about the Dicke model, as I'm struggling to understand Dickes papers, but for a system interacting with field :
E=A cos(kx-ωt)
Assume that the wavelength of E is large enough that all N dipoles see ~ the same E,
so
E=A cos(ωt)
Then coherent if the response of the dipoles is the same and has the same time evolution,
Dipole 1 has moment
P1 = e cos(ωt)
Same as dipole 2
P2= e cos(ωt)
If they interacted incoherently then
P2= e cos(ωt + p(t))
Where p(t) is some time varying phase difference in the dipoles responce.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top