Understanding Complex Conjugates in QM (Griffiths pg. 13)

  • Thread starter Thread starter RahSuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of complex conjugates in the context of Schrödinger's equation as presented in Griffiths' "Quantum Mechanics." Participants clarify that taking the complex conjugate of an equation, such as Schrödinger's, is valid and maintains equality, even when derivatives are involved. This principle holds true for complex expressions, allowing for the manipulation of normalized solutions without loss of generality. The transition from Equation 1.23 to Equation 1.24 is justified through the properties of complex numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's equation in Quantum Mechanics
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
  • Concept of normalization in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex conjugates in mathematical expressions
  • Learn about the implications of normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the derivation and applications of Schrödinger's equation
  • Investigate the role of complex variables in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of complex numbers in the context of differential equations and normalization in quantum systems.

RahSuh
Messages
10
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Page 13 of Griffiths on Quantum Mechanics ( the part on Normalization)
Relevant Equations
Am look at the proof of normalised solns of Schrodingers Eqn stay normalised
Am looking at page 13 of QM by Griffiths - have become stuck on minor point. He is proving that a normalised solution of Schrodingers eqn stays normalised. The bit I don't get is how can you just take the complex conjugate of Schrodingers eqn and assume its true. (ie how does he get from Eqn 1.23 to Eqn 1.24) I assume it true but how ? I get that for example, the complex conjugate of the product of 2 complex numbers is the product of the complex conjugates etc - but does it apply to differential eqns. Can you just take the complex conjugates of differential eqns. Thanks for help in advance! (am sure its something very simple)
Normalisation.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RahSuh said:
Homework Statement:: Page 13 of Griffiths on Quantum Mechanics ( the part on Normalization)
Relevant Equations:: Am look at the proof of normalised solns of Schrodingers Eqn stay normalised

Am looking at page 13 of QM by Grif tufiths - have become stuck on minor point. He is proving that a normalised solution of Schrodingers eqn stays no normalised. The bit I don't get is how can you just take the complex congugate of Schrodingers eqn and assume its true. I assume it true but how ? (I get that you the complex conjugate of the product of 2 complex numbers is the product of the complex conjugates etc - but does it apply to differential eqns. Thanks for help in advance! (am sure its something very simple)View attachment 315309
Yes. If you have any expression ##A = B## then ##A^*= B^*##. This holds true, even if we are taking the derivative with respect to a complex variable:
##\dfrac{dA}{dz} = B \implies \dfrac{dA^*}{d z^*} = B^*## (though we usually change the notation from ##z^*## to ##\overline{z}##.)

As t is usually taken to be real we don't do anything with that.

-Dan
 
You can show that formally. After all, the left and right side of Schrödinger's equation are complex numbers (or expressions thereof).
One can always write two complex numbers as the sum of a real and an imaginary part,
##z_1=a_1+ib_1## and ##z_2=a_2+ib_2##.
If ##z_1=z_2##, it follows that ##a_1=a_2## and ##b_1=b_2##. Then
##z_1^*=a_1-ib_1=a_2-ib_2=z_2^*##, Q.E.D.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and hutchphd

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K