Understanding Complex Conjugates in QM (Griffiths pg. 13)

  • Thread starter Thread starter RahSuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Qm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the process of taking the complex conjugate of Schrödinger's equation in Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics text. Participants clarify that if two expressions are equal, their complex conjugates are also equal, even when derivatives are involved. This principle applies to differential equations, as both sides of Schrödinger's equation consist of complex numbers. The conversation emphasizes that the normalization of solutions remains valid through this process. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the proof that normalized solutions of Schrödinger's equation stay normalized.
RahSuh
Messages
10
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Page 13 of Griffiths on Quantum Mechanics ( the part on Normalization)
Relevant Equations
Am look at the proof of normalised solns of Schrodingers Eqn stay normalised
Am looking at page 13 of QM by Griffiths - have become stuck on minor point. He is proving that a normalised solution of Schrodingers eqn stays normalised. The bit I don't get is how can you just take the complex conjugate of Schrodingers eqn and assume its true. (ie how does he get from Eqn 1.23 to Eqn 1.24) I assume it true but how ? I get that for example, the complex conjugate of the product of 2 complex numbers is the product of the complex conjugates etc - but does it apply to differential eqns. Can you just take the complex conjugates of differential eqns. Thanks for help in advance! (am sure its something very simple)
Normalisation.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RahSuh said:
Homework Statement:: Page 13 of Griffiths on Quantum Mechanics ( the part on Normalization)
Relevant Equations:: Am look at the proof of normalised solns of Schrodingers Eqn stay normalised

Am looking at page 13 of QM by Grif tufiths - have become stuck on minor point. He is proving that a normalised solution of Schrodingers eqn stays no normalised. The bit I don't get is how can you just take the complex congugate of Schrodingers eqn and assume its true. I assume it true but how ? (I get that you the complex conjugate of the product of 2 complex numbers is the product of the complex conjugates etc - but does it apply to differential eqns. Thanks for help in advance! (am sure its something very simple)View attachment 315309
Yes. If you have any expression ##A = B## then ##A^*= B^*##. This holds true, even if we are taking the derivative with respect to a complex variable:
##\dfrac{dA}{dz} = B \implies \dfrac{dA^*}{d z^*} = B^*## (though we usually change the notation from ##z^*## to ##\overline{z}##.)

As t is usually taken to be real we don't do anything with that.

-Dan
 
You can show that formally. After all, the left and right side of Schrodinger's equation are complex numbers (or expressions thereof).
One can always write two complex numbers as the sum of a real and an imaginary part,
##z_1=a_1+ib_1## and ##z_2=a_2+ib_2##.
If ##z_1=z_2##, it follows that ##a_1=a_2## and ##b_1=b_2##. Then
##z_1^*=a_1-ib_1=a_2-ib_2=z_2^*##, Q.E.D.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and hutchphd
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top