Understanding Conditional Probability with Dependent Variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter hodor
  • Start date Start date
hodor
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've run into a snag trying to read a textbook problem. Here is the original example, it's pretty straightforward. The problem I have is when I get to the exercise and it asks me to place a restriction on this example. This restriction seems to break the independence of two variables and renders all the probabilities in the original example useless to me. For example:

HXPAUZ8.jpg


a6cTuIp.jpg


So, ignoring that it's asking for a code update here, I seem to have P(Butler = murderer, Maid = murderer) = 0 and so on. But it appears I can't recalculate P(K) (knife used) since B and M are no longer independent. So I really don't understand how to proceed. This leads me to believe I'm misinterpreting things so I thought I'd ask here. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see why you would need that independence. You have P(B, not M) and P(M, not B) and there are no other cases to consider.
 
Ok, I had thought since those probabilities had changed, the P(k|B,M) probabilities would also have to change, and without ndependence I wouldn't be able to recalculate. It seems I can set P(K|B=murderer,M=murderer)=0 and reuse the others unchanged, but that still makes me a bit uncomfortable?
 
hodor said:
It seems I can set P(K|B=murderer,M=murderer)=0 and reuse the others unchanged, but that still makes me a bit uncomfortable?

No, P(K|B=murderer,M=murderer) is not changed - it is P(B=murderer,M=murderer) that is 0, and P(B=murderer,~M=murderer) etc. are different.
 
ok, thanks. I had assumed that since P(B=murderer,M=murderer) had changed, P(K|B=murderer,M=murderer) would change since P(K|B=murderer,M=murderer) = P(K,B=murderer,M=Murderer)/P(B=murderer,M=murderer), and similarly for the other conditionals.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top