Understanding Constant Velocity and Acceleration in Frictionless Environments

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reisen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames Motion
AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless environment, if a box is initially at rest while a boxcar moves forward at a constant velocity, the box will slide backward due to inertia. The force readout of 18N on the scale indicates that the box is being accelerated if it were initially stationary. However, if both the box and the boxcar are moving at the same constant velocity, there is no relative motion, and thus no force is needed to keep the box in place. The confusion arises from mixing real-world scenarios with idealized physics concepts. Understanding the difference between initial conditions and constant velocity clarifies the situation.
Reisen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Your standard first-post-pleading-for-help here :)

This doesn't make sense:

Say you've got a setup like in picture 1 (floor is frictionless)

If the F readout on the scale is 18N, and the box is 5kg and F=ma, then 18N/5kg = 3.6m/s^2 = a, right? Okay...

Now, if the velocity is constant, there is no acceleration, yes? But then F = ma, then F = 5kg * (0m/s^2) = 0. But if the boxcar were moving forward at a constant rate with a frictionless floor, the box would slide to the back, wouldn't it? The rope has to be exerting SOME force on the box to keep it in place, so that's why I'm wondering how this doesn't work.

Thanks in advance to whoever points out my mistake :)

-Reisen
 

Attachments

  • boxcar.gif
    boxcar.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 570
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if everything in your picture, the box, car and scale is moving at the same constant velocity initally then nothing would change. Everything would in the same position relative to everything else.

However if the box is not moving initally but everything else is then yes, the box would move towards the back of the truck and the scale would have to apply a force on the box to accelerate it.
 
Ah, yes. Thank you. I was getting the real world all confused with the perfect world of elementary physics :D

That answers my question, thank you.

-Reisen
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top