Understanding Conventional vs. Non-Conventional Current in Circuit Analysis

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jewish_Vulcan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concepts of conventional and non-conventional current in circuit analysis, exploring their implications for solving circuit problems related to voltage, resistance, current, and capacitance. Participants examine the definitions and roles of different charge carriers in various materials, including semiconductors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that conventional current is defined as the flow of positive charge from positive to negative, while electrons flow from negative to positive.
  • Others argue that the concept of non-conventional current is unclear, suggesting that the direction assigned to current does not affect circuit analysis since a negative result simply indicates the opposite direction.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of current in different materials, with some noting that current can involve both positive and negative charge carriers, complicating the simplistic view of electron flow.
  • Participants mention that in semiconductors, positive charge carriers known as holes move in the opposite direction to electrons, yet both contribute to current in the same direction.
  • One participant emphasizes that using the term "current" allows for a more straightforward analysis of electrical circuits without getting bogged down in the complexities of particle movement.
  • Another participant questions the role of positrons in circuits, expressing uncertainty about what constitutes current beyond electrons.
  • There is a mention of the importance of understanding the movement of holes in semiconductors, which are created when electrons leave atoms.
  • Some participants caution against relying solely on electron flow for circuit calculations, suggesting that it can lead to misunderstandings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions and implications of conventional versus non-conventional current. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of current and the relevance of different charge carriers in circuit analysis.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of current, the complexity of charge carrier behavior in different materials, and the potential for misunderstandings when applying simplified models to complex electrical phenomena.

Jewish_Vulcan
Messages
88
Reaction score
4
I know that conventional current is when the electrons flow from cathode to anode but I was wondering if there is any difference in solving a circuit for its voltage resistance current capacitance etc.. with non conventional current do you get a difference answer and do engineers ever use non conventional current?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jew_vulcan said:
I know that conventional current is when the electrons flow from cathode to anode but I was wondering if there is any difference in solving a circuit for its voltage resistance current capacitance etc.. with non conventional current do you get a difference answer and do engineers ever use non conventional current?

I don't know what you mean by "non conventional current". It is irrelevant what direction you assign to a current when you are solving a circuit problem since if you have assigned the "wrong" direction, you just get a negative answer.
 
I thought "conventional" current was from positive to negative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Symmetry777
jew_vulcan said:
I know that conventional current is when the electrons flow from cathode to anode

That is a very limited idea of what "current" is. In most materials except for metals, (for example sparks in air or current in living creatures, electronic components, batteries, etc) current is NOT necessarily "the flow of electrons" at all. There may be both positive and negatively charged particles, moving in opposite directions.

To analyze electrical circuits, using "conventional current" flowing from positive to negative voltage allows you to ignore all those complications, and also to ignore the electrons.

If engineers need to understand how components like transistors or batteries work, as opposed to understanding how to use them, then they need to look at all the details of the physics, and that may involve quantum mechanics rather than the simplified idea of "charged particles moving about".
 
Semiconductors can have positive charge carriers called holes. The circuit law equations are no different. Holes carry positive charge from the cathode to the anode and electrons carry charge from the anode to the cathode. Because they have opposite charge they both produce current in the same direction even though they move in opposite directions.

I suppose the same would be true for currents made by positive and negative ions in water.

You made a mistake, btw. Electrons flow from anode to cathode (negative to positive). Current flows from positive to negative. Electrons flow in the opposite direction of the current you see in circuit equations (if you follow convention).
 
Last edited:
Drakkith said:
I thought "conventional" current was from positive to negative.

yeah me too ( ie not electron flow)

Dave
 
So what particle is flowing in a circuit when there is current. I know that electrons go from negative to positive but what goes from positive to negatie in a circuit is a positron but I am pretty sure that antimatter does not take place. I usually use current in terms of circuit what do you mean that current can be something else besides an electron.
 
its the electrons that are "flowing" so there is a charge moving from negative to positive

this is used because its the "free" valence electrons in a conductor that are able to move

Dave
 
So what particle is flowing in a circuit when there is current. I know that electrons go from negative to positive but what goes from positive to negatie in a circuit is a positron but I am pretty sure that antimatter does not take place.

When an electron breaks loose from an atom and becomes free it leaves behind a "hole" which is an atom with a net positive charge. That hole will accept other electrons from other atoms and so the hole or positive charge moves about. The atom itself doesn't move but the net positive charge does. Mainly important in semiconductors.
 
  • #10
If you try to use 'electrons' in circuit calculations, you will fall on your face before long. Likewise, if you use 'electrons' to explain what happens in electrolytic cells. The whole point about dealing with electrical problems using Current is that it doesn't matter what is carrying the charge. It is not a cop out to use Current. It is not 'wrong'. It just makes sense and avoids all those misunderstandings that people have when they try to use a half understood picture of an electron and try to apply it to a problem that's too complex. You may as well say that someone is not doing it properly when they use algebra / calculus / trig functions, which are half way along the path between numbers and physical results.

Can you find any instance of a textbook that uses electrons when "solving a circuit"? Why do you think that is?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Symmetry777
  • #11
Is the electron hole the thing that moves from positive to negative? I know electrons travel through these empty electron shells because they are attracted by its lack of a negative charge, making it have a positive charge relative to the other electrons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K