Understanding demand and supply curves

  • Thread starter Thread starter dpa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Supply
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the representation of demand and supply curves in economics, specifically regarding the equations QD = 5600 – 8P and QS = 500 + 4P. Participants highlight that the supply curve's graph does not align with the given equation, suggesting a possible error in the formulation. The conversation emphasizes the common practice of treating quantity as a function of price while graphing, which can lead to misunderstandings for beginners. It is noted that the supply curve should reflect a price of zero only when quantity supplied is also zero, indicating a potential misinterpretation of the equations. Overall, the dialogue underscores the importance of clarity in economic graphing conventions and the need for accurate equation representation.
dpa
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I am having hardtime understanding this problem.
I have two functions:
QD = 5600 – 8P
QS = 500 + 4P

Why is the graph like the one attached and not the normal mathematical graph where supply curve starts from y=(0,-125)?
Do ignore the consumer surplus and producer surplus part. That is irrelevant.
How (and why) do we proceed in this way in our calculations?
 

Attachments

  • asdasd.PNG
    asdasd.PNG
    4.6 KB · Views: 676
Physics news on Phys.org
P is the dependent variable in the graph. Rearrange the two equations and it will make sense (or reflect the graph about y=x). This is the one really annoying thing about an introduction to economics, you just get used to it. They always consider quantity to be a function of price but interchange them when graphing.
 
Suppose I rearrange the equations,
then P=700-0.125QD [which is fine without reflection and same as QD=5600-QD]
But, next P=0.25QS-125 but the graph is for 0.25QS+125. Note the + and _ after QS. It works with reflection. but not normally. Is there a certain convention. I mean am I always supposed to reflect along y=x line for supply curve only?
But then suppose we had QS=-500+4P. Would its y-intercept be (0,-125)?
 
Sorry, I didn't notice that. Algebra is still algebra, somebody made an error. The supply curve graphed is not the equation given. My guess is that they intended QS=4P-500 because the equation as written makes no sense. It implies that a producer would be willing to offer a supply of 500 at a price of zero which is absurd. So your equation is wrong, the graph given does not match the equation given, and the graph given does not match the alternative equation that I provided. They clearly intended that the producer would not offer anything until the price hit 125 but they messed up the whole thing. You should point this out. You have not lost your mind. :)
 
alan2 said:
P is the dependent variable in the graph. Rearrange the two equations and it will make sense (or reflect the graph about y=x). This is the one really annoying thing about an introduction to economics, you just get used to it. They always consider quantity to be a function of price but interchange them when graphing.
Yeah, that is a little weird. But I find it's a useful convention when including the various cost curves (eg. marginal and average total cost) on the same graph as the demand curve, since cost is a function of quantity produced.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top