I Understanding Diffraction Condition in Kittle's Intro to Solid State Physics

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the confusion surrounding the phase difference angles for incident and diffracted waves in Kittle's Introduction to Solid State Physics. It highlights that the phase difference for the incident wave is positive, while the diffracted wave's phase difference is negative due to the direction of the wave vectors. The user references a figure to explain that the phase advances for the incident wave, and upon reflection, the sign must be inverted for the diffracted wave. This inversion is necessary to accurately calculate the total phase difference resulting from reflection. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the diffraction condition in solid-state physics.
Mart1234
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Diffraction Condition derivation in Kittle's Introduction to Solid State Physics
I am going over the diffraction condition section in Kittle's Introduction to Solid State Physics physics and I am having a hard time understanding why the phase difference angle for the incident wave is positive while the phase angle difference for the diffracted wave is negative. Thank you for the help.

1676492080257.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mart1234 said:
TL;DR Summary: Diffraction Condition derivation in Kittle's Introduction to Solid State Physics

I am having a hard time understanding why the phase difference angle for the incident wave is positive while the phase angle difference for the diffracted wave is negativeiy
I see in the figure attached that
\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{r}>0.....(1)
The phase of upside or outside wave advances until reflection.
\mathbf{k'}\cdot \mathbf{r}<0.....(2)
The phase of upside or outside wave advance after reflection also so sign must be inverted for addition to (1) to give the full phase difference by reflection.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...