Understanding Einstein's Relativity: From Energy Equations to Series Development

  • Thread starter Thread starter OneEye
  • Start date Start date
OneEye
In Relativity, (p. 45), Dr. Einstein says:

...the energy of a material point of mass m is no longer gievn by the well-known expression

m { v \over c^2 }

but by the expression

{ m c^2 } \over \sqrt { 1 - { v^2 \over c^2 } }

...If we develop the expression for the kinetic energy in the form of a series, we obtain

mc^2 + m { v^2 \over 2 } + { 3 \over 8 } m { v^4 \over c^2 } . . . .

How does one get from the second equation to the third? What is meant by "develop[ing] the expression... in the form of a series"?

Any help would be more than appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way is to use a "Taylor's series" expansion.

If f is any function, analytic at x0 then
f(x)= f(x0)+ f '(x0)(x- x0)+ (f''(x0)/2)(x- x0)2+ (f'''(x0)/6)(x- x0)3+ ...
the general term is (f(n)(x0)/n!)(x-x0)n where f(n) is the nth derivative.

In particular, use the "McLaurin series" which is the Taylor's series with x0= 0 and f(x)= (1+ x2/c2)-1/2, set x= v, and then multiply by mc2.
 
HoI - Thanks - I suspected something like this, but lacked the mathematical toolkit to know what exactly was meant.

Most helpful!
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top