Understanding EM in GR: Maxwell's Equations and Particle Motion Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Gr
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
So apparently (wiki), the manisfestly covariant form of Maxwell's equations is dF=0 and d*F=µJ for F the Faraday 2-form and J the current 3-form. My question will probably seem silly to you but I am simply wondering how does this field affect the motion of a particle of charge q in GR? Is it just m_0\nabla_{\dot{\gamma}}\dot{\gamma}=f for some 4-force vector field f? If so, what is the 4-force f corresponding to a Faraday 2-form F? Thanks again! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##u^a\triangledown_au^b = \frac{q}{m}F^{b}{}{}_cu^c##.
 
Ok so now I think I understand better what Einstein wanted to do in his later years. He simply wanted to get rid of F=ma altogether! He had done it for gravity and now he wanted to incorporate EM into the geometric structure as well.
 
That is very cool WBN. Thanks for that link. :)
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top