Understanding Energy and Kinetic Equations: A Quick Question Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter linnus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
K in the equation K=1/2mv^2 represents the kinetic energy of an object with mass m and velocity v, not the change in kinetic energy. To determine the change in kinetic energy, one must calculate the difference between final and initial kinetic energy, expressed as Kfinal - Kinitial, which equals the total work done (Wtotal). The discussion also touches on potential energy, emphasizing that only changes in energy can be calculated, and absolute kinetic energy requires an arbitrary reference point for a body at rest. The conversation highlights the importance of defining a reference value for kinetic energy when considering a stationary object. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing energy transformations in physics.
linnus
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
When they say K=1/2mv^2 does K mean the change of kinetic energy? because Wtotal= the change of kinetic energy...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
linnus said:
When they say K=1/2mv^2 does K mean the change of kinetic energy? because Wtotal= the change of kinetic energy...

1/2 mv^2 gives the kinetic energy of an object with mass m moving with velocity v. To find the change in kinetic energy, one would have to solve for Kfinal - Kinitial, which would be equal to the Wtotal of which you speak.
 
to calculate change in K.E we have formula 0.5*mass*(v*v-u*u)...
think about potential energy
we can calculate only change (d)
and arbitarily assume U at some point and express potential energy as
d+U(initial)=U(final).
actualy we can perform only relative analysis
and therefore diff of K.E of a moving body velocity v with respect to body at rest can be obtained by substituting u=0..

but to calculate absolute K.E we must take an arbitarily some value of K.E for body at rest...and then add it to the difference

and so what do you think is most appropriate, logical & convinient value to be given to the body at rest .??


well your question was good but a bit vague inexpression I think..:smile:
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top