Understanding Even Numbers in Set S Divisible by 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter avec_holl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Numbers Set
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of a set S of natural numbers, where every even number in S is divisible by 5. It concludes that 2 cannot be in S because it is not divisible by 5, while 5 can be included since it is odd. It asserts that every even number in S must also be divisible by 10, but S does not necessarily contain all multiples of 10 and could potentially be empty. The participants agree on the need for clarity regarding the inclusion of multiples of 10 in S. Overall, the key points emphasize the specific divisibility rules that define the structure of set S.
avec_holl
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let S be a set of Natural numbers with the property that every even number in S is divisible by 5. Which of the following must be true.

a. 2 is not in S
b. 5 is not in S
c. S contains all multiples of 10
d. Every even number in S is divisible by 10
e. S contains no odd numbers

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



Just want to make sure my logic isn't faltering anywhere so here's what I figured . . .

a. 2 is even, 2 is not divisible by 5, therefore 2 is not a member of S
b. 5 is a natural number, 5 is not even, therefore 5 may be a member of S
c. S does not necessarily contain all multiples of 10
d. Every even member in S must be divisible by 10
e. S may contain odd numbers

Based on this a and d must be true. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct to me! Good job. You might a little more specific on (c) though, as you can give examples of which multiples of 10 the set S cannot contain.
 
I think you've nailed it. Nice work.
 
n!kofeyn said:
It looks correct to me! Good job. You might a little more specific on (c) though, as you can give examples of which multiples of 10 the set S cannot contain.

S might not contain any multiples of 10. It might, in fact, be empty. What would be wrong with that?
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
S may not contain any multiples of 10. It might, in fact, be empty. What would be wrong with that?

Nothing is wrong with that. What I was getting at is that avec_holl should remove the word necessarily from the sentence "S does not necessarily contain all multiples of 10". This is because S does not contain all multiples of 10. For example, if n is a negative integer, then S cannot contain 10n. The way it was originally written says to me that it is possible for S to contain all multiples of 10, but we can't tell.
 
Back
Top