Understanding Flip-Flop Truth & Excitation Tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter ranju
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Excitation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between truth tables and excitation tables for flip-flops. A truth table outlines all possible combinations of inputs and outputs, providing a comprehensive overview of the flip-flop's behavior. In contrast, an excitation table specifies the necessary inputs to transition the flip-flop from its current state to the next state. Specifically, it indicates the inputs required for state changes, such as moving from 0 to 1. Understanding these differences is crucial for effectively utilizing flip-flops in digital circuits.
ranju
Messages
221
Reaction score
3
I am not getting these truth table & excitation table for a flip-flop.. I mean I can understand it but what is the difference between the two?? they are same to a large extent what actually is differentiating an excitation table from a truth table??
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Truth Table tells you all the possible combinations of inputs and outputs.

Whereas, an excitation table tells you the inputs required to be applied to the flip-flop to take it from the present state to the next state.
Alternatively, an excitation table tells you the inputs you require for transitions from like 0 (present state) to 1 (next state).
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top