Understanding Full Adders in Verilog: Code Explanation and Help Request

  • Thread starter Thread starter polaris90
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the code for a 4-bit full adder in Verilog, particularly the line "fulladder f1(SW[5],SW[1],a,LEDG[1],b)." The user expresses confusion about the implementation and functionality of carry adders, noting that their textbook lacks clarity. They seek assistance in comprehending this specific line of code, which is frequently encountered but poorly explained in resources. A suggested link was provided to help clarify the topic further. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for better educational resources on Verilog full adders.
polaris90
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
We are currently working with full adders in my logic circuits class.

I have the following code for a 4-bi full adder, however I'm having trouble understanding it and my textbook does a poor job at explaining the carry adders. fulladder f1(SW[5],SW[1],a,LEDG[1],b);this is the only line that I don't understand. I've seen this kind of code several times but no-one explains it. Can someone give a hand?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
polaris90 said:
fulladder f1(SW[5],SW[1],a,LEDG[1],b);


this is the only line that I don't understand. I've seen this kind of code several times but no-one explains it. Can someone give a hand?
A google search turned up this: http://www.expertcore.org/viewtopic.php?t=767[/color]

I think that should help a bit. :wink:
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top