Do the first and second fundamental forms relate to the metric and curvature in GR?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter madness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
madness
Messages
813
Reaction score
69
So I've taken courses in metric spaces and differential geometry this year and one of the main reasons for choosing these courses was to understand GR better. I'm finally getting round to actually learning my differential geometry course, and have come across the "first fundamental form" of a surface. Am I right in thinking that this is the "metric" of GR (more specifically it is the interval, and the metric is the matrix of the first fundamental form in the right basis)? Does the second fundamental form describe curvature in GR? Is it related to the Riemann tensor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "first fundamental form" is the "line element".
 
atyy said:
The "first fundamental form" is the "line element".

By line element you mean the infinitessimal interval right? Anyway, when calculating the curvature of a surface, you consider the first and fundamental forms as matrices and find the eigenvalues of II with respect to II, i.e. det(II-kI)=0. Then the matrix of I is the metric in GR, which is very different from the usual metric studies in metric spaces.