I Understanding Hamiltonian Conservation Laws

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding Hamiltonian conservation laws, specifically how to derive conserved quantities from the Hamiltonian. It is established that if the Hamiltonian has no explicit time dependence, it is conserved. The relationship between phase-space functions and their time derivatives is explored using Hamilton's equations, leading to the conclusion that a quantity is conserved if its total time derivative vanishes. The conversation also touches on the connection between symmetries and conserved quantities, highlighting Noether's theorem. A novice participant expresses difficulty in understanding the mathematical concepts presented, indicating a need for clearer explanations.
Physgeek64
Messages
245
Reaction score
11
I'm a little confused about the hamiltonian.

Once you have the hamiltonian how can you find conserved quantities. I understand that if it has no explicit dependence on time then the hamiltonian itself is conserved, but how would you get specific conservation laws from this?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately you do not tell us about your level. Do you know Poisson brackets? If so, you question is quite easy to answer. Suppose you have an arbitrary phase-space function ##f(t,q^k,p_j)## (##k,j \in \{1,\ldots,f \}##) then the total time derivative is
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{ \mathrm{d} t} f=\dot{q}^k \frac{\partial f}{\partial q^k}+\dot{p}_j \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_j} + \partial_t f,$$
where the latter partial time derivative refers to the explicit time dependence of ##f## only. Now use the Hamilton equations of motion
$$\dot{q}^k=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_k}, \quad \dot{p}_j=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial q^j}.$$
Plugging this in the time derivative you get
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{ \mathrm{d} t} f=\frac{\partial f}{\partial q^k} \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_k} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_j} \frac{\partial H}{\partial q^j} + \partial_t f=\{f,H \}+\partial_t f.$$
A quantity is thus obviously conserved by definition if this expression vanishes.

Applying this to the Hamiltonian itself you get
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} H=\{H,H\}+\partial_t H=\partial_t H,$$
i.e., ##H## is conserved (along the trajectory of the system) if and only if it is not explicitly time dependent.

Now an infinitesimal canonical transformation is generated by an arbitrary phase-space distribution function ##G##,
$$\delta q^k=\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_k}\delta \alpha=\{q^k,G\} \delta \alpha, \quad \delta p_j=-\frac{\partial G}{\partial q^j} \delta \alpha =\{p_j,G \} \delta \alpha, \quad \delta H=\partial_t G \delta \alpha.$$
From this it is easy to show that
$$H'(t,q+\delta q,p+\delta p) = H(t,q,p),$$
i.e., that the infinitesimal canonical transformation is a symmetry of the Hamiltonian, if and only if
$$\{H,G \}+\partial_t G=0,$$
but that means that
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} G=0$$
along the trajectory of the system, i.e., the generator of a symmetry transformation is a conserved quantity, and also any conserved quantity is the generator of a symmetry transformation. That means that there's a one-to-one relation between the generators of symmetries and conserved quantities, which is one of Noether's famous theorems.
 
vanhees71 said:
Unfortunately you do not tell us about your level. Do you know Poisson brackets? If so, you question is quite easy to answer. Suppose you have an arbitrary phase-space function ##f(t,q^k,p_j)## (##k,j \in \{1,\ldots,f \}##) then the total time derivative is
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{ \mathrm{d} t} f=\dot{q}^k \frac{\partial f}{\partial q^k}+\dot{p}_j \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_j} + \partial_t f,$$
where the latter partial time derivative refers to the explicit time dependence of ##f## only. Now use the Hamilton equations of motion
$$\dot{q}^k=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_k}, \quad \dot{p}_j=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial q^j}.$$
Plugging this in the time derivative you get
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{ \mathrm{d} t} f=\frac{\partial f}{\partial q^k} \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_k} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_j} \frac{\partial H}{\partial q^j} + \partial_t f=\{f,H \}+\partial_t f.$$
A quantity is thus obviously conserved by definition if this expression vanishes.

Applying this to the Hamiltonian itself you get
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} H=\{H,H\}+\partial_t H=\partial_t H,$$
i.e., ##H## is conserved (along the trajectory of the system) if and only if it is not explicitly time dependent.

Now an infinitesimal canonical transformation is generated by an arbitrary phase-space distribution function ##G##,
$$\delta q^k=\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_k}\delta \alpha=\{q^k,G\} \delta \alpha, \quad \delta p_j=-\frac{\partial G}{\partial q^j} \delta \alpha =\{p_j,G \} \delta \alpha, \quad \delta H=\partial_t G \delta \alpha.$$
From this it is easy to show that
$$H'(t,q+\delta q,p+\delta p) = H(t,q,p),$$
i.e., that the infinitesimal canonical transformation is a symmetry of the Hamiltonian, if and only if
$$\{H,G \}+\partial_t G=0,$$
but that means that
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} G=0$$
along the trajectory of the system, i.e., the generator of a symmetry transformation is a conserved quantity, and also any conserved quantity is the generator of a symmetry transformation. That means that there's a one-to-one relation between the generators of symmetries and conserved quantities, which is one of Noether's famous theorems.

Sorry- no I don't know about Poisson brackets- I'm a complete novice. Haven't encountered hamiltonians before, nor do I know much about them.

Thank you for your response though! Unfortunately I can't see any of the maths you've included- For some reason my computer thinks its an error
 
Physgeek64 said:
Unfortunately I can't see any of the maths you've included- For some reason my computer thinks its an error

Right-click on the math error, go to Math Settings -> Math Renderer and try e.g. HTML-CSS (or some other renderer).
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top