Understanding Hermitian Operators and Their Properties on Complex Functions

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
Let

\mathcal{L} = \frac{d}{dx} p(x) \frac{d}{dx} + q(x)

be a self-adjoint operator on functions f : [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{C}. Under what circumstances is the operator Hermitian with

<u|v> = \int_a^b u^*(x) v(x) dx
?

Can someone give me a hint on this one? I know that hermitian operators satisfies

<u|\mathcal{L}v> = <\mathcal{L}u|v>

but I don't really get the question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Logarythmic said:
Let

\mathcal{L} = \frac{d}{dx} p(x) \frac{d}{dx} + q(x)

be a self-adjoint operator on functions f : [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{C}. Under what circumstances is the operator Hermitian with

<u|v> = \int_a^b u^*(x) v(x) dx
?

Can someone give me a hint on this one? I know that hermitian operators satisfies

<u|\mathcal{L}v> = <\mathcal{L}u|v>

but I don't really get the question.
My guess is it is something very close to what is done here.

http://www.math.sdu.edu.cn/mathency/math/h/h215.htm

What does f : [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{C} mean? Is this a completeness condition?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not a completeness condition, just specifying the domain (from a to b) and the range (complex numbers)...

But as for the question, since you know the Hermitian condition, plug in your actual operator L and then simplify both sides, possibly integrating by parts to shift derivatives around. Then, when you have the two sides looking somewhat similar, you should be able to come up with conditions under which the two sides are equal.

(Yeah, I know that's kind of vague, but it should get you started...)
 
TMFKAN64 said:
Not a completeness condition, just specifying the domain (from a to b) and the range (complex numbers)...
Thanks. I always was weak on those funny letter math symbols :rolleyes:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top