Understanding Higgs-Z Ditau Decay Momentum Effects

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I am having some hard time to understand how the Higgs-Z boson ditau decays can result in different momenta for the pion-products (in the very simple scenario where \tau \rightarrow \pi \nu.

The decay angular distribution is given by:
\frac{1}{\Gamma} \frac{d \Gamma}{d \cos \theta} \propto \frac{1}{2} (1+ P_\tau \cos \theta)
Where P_\tau is the average polarization of the sample and \theta is the angle between the momentum of the tau and the pion (I believe in the lab frame). For all left-handed taus P_\tau = -1 and for all right-handed taus P_\tau = +1.
By using some kinematics one can find that:
\cos \theta = \frac{2x -1 -a^2}{\beta_\tau (1- a^2)} \approx 2x -1
Where a= \frac{m_\pi}{m_\tau} and so we neglected its square, and \beta_\tau is tau's velocity which can be taken to be \beta \approx 1 due to the large mass difference between Z/H and taus.
So
\frac{1}{\Gamma} \frac{d \Gamma}{d x} \propto 1+ P_\tau (2x -1)

From this last relation, how can someone deduce that a right-handed \tau^- (left-handed \tau^+) decays into hard pions while left-handed \tau^- (right-handed \tau^+) decays into soft pions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Every angle in the lab frame would depend on the tau energy. It could be the angle between pion motion and tau spin or something similar.

What is x?

One spin orientation (relative to flight) tends to decay via a forward emission of pions (high energy), one tends towards a backwards emission (low energy).
 
Sorry I forgot to define x ... x= E_\pi / E_\tau the fraction of the energy of the tau carried away by the pion.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top