Understanding Index Sets and Unions in Set Theory: Real Analysis Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chantry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Index Set
Chantry
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm reading through the introductory pages of my real analysis book and for some reason I can't wrap my head around this seemingly simple concept. The book is talking about collections of sets and something new to me called the "index set".

I apologize ahead of time, because I don't know how to properly format my formulas.

Let U be the union and ^ be the intersection.

U from n = 1 to infinite of (0,n) = (0,infinite)
^ from n = 1 to infinite of (0,n) = (0,1)

I have no idea what that is supposed to represent.

Another example,

U n = 1 to infinite of (-n,n) = R
^ n = 1 to infinite (-n,n) = (-1,1)

I don't understand where that logical jump comes from. What does the integers have to do with the Reals? and -1,1? I'm completely at a loss to explain what they're trying to get across.

I think I'm missing something vital here, but I think the book is skimming over the subject as it's probably pretty elementary. Can anyone help me fill in the gap?

Homework Equations



There's not really anything to say here. It's basic set theory.

The Attempt at a Solution



It's a simple matter of notation and it's not in the form of a question, so this isn't applicable for my question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you missing the fact that (a,b) is the interval consisting of all real numbers x such that a<x<b?
 
Definitely missed that completely.

Thanks a lot. It's amazing how the simplest things can sometimes give you so much trouble.

Just to make sure I'm understanding it correctly, the U 1 to infinite of (0,n) is saying you're doing a union of {0, .. Real Values, .., 1} U {0, .., 2} U {0,..,3} .. U {0,..,infinite}, correct?
 
Yup.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top