Understanding Liouville Space Super-Operators: A Simple Computation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Einstein Mcfly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computation
Einstein Mcfly
Messages
161
Reaction score
3
"straightforward computation..."

Hello. I am reading a paper that discusses moving from a regular NxN dimensional Hilbert space into and N^2 X N^2 dimensional Liouville space. The density matrix can be re-written as a 1 X N^2vector by stacking the rows and the Liouvile equation can be re-written as N^2 X N^2"super-operators" acting on the new density-matrix "vector". The actual form of this super-operator is given by "a straightforward computation" where the field free and interaction Hamiltonians are given by
H_o=\left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> -hw &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; hw<br /> \end{array}\right)
and
H_1=\left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 &amp; d1 \\<br /> d1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}\right)

The Liouville space super operators describing these in the expanded space are:
L_o=<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -hw &amp;0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; homework &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}\right)
and

L_1=<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 0 &amp; -d1 &amp; d1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> -d1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; d1\\<br /> d1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -d1\\<br /> 0 &amp; d1 &amp; -d1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}\right)

It looks like they're takind a direct product with something, but I can't tell with what or why. They make is sound like it's all just a pretty standard way to write a matrix in a larger space, so if anyone recognizes what's going on here, I'd really happy for your help. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##L_1## looks more like a tenso product than a direct product, since the secondary diagonal isn't empty. Tensor products are also a standard method to extent e.g. the scalar domain.

The dyads over the Hilbert space build a basis for the Liouville space.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top