Understanding Logical Statements: P(x) and Q(x) in Z | Examples and Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demonoid
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding two logical statements involving the assertions P(x) for "x is odd" and Q(x) for "x is twice an integer." The first statement asks if every odd integer is twice another integer, which is false, as odd integers cannot be expressed in that form. The second statement questions whether the truth of all integers being odd implies that all integers are twice another integer, which is also false since not all integers are odd. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly interpreting logical implications and the conditions under which they hold true. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately evaluating the truth of the statements.
Demonoid
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm a little stuck with these bad boys:

Let P(x) be the assertion “x is odd”, and let Q(x) be the assertion “x is twice an integer.” Determine whether the following statements are true:

1. (Vx ∈ Z)(P(x) ⇒ Q(x))
2. (Vx ∈ Z)(P(x)) ⇒ (Vx ∈ Z)(Q(x))

My attempt:

I don't get the statement at all; if x is odd then 2x ? maybe if x is odd then 2x is even ?
Is that what they're trying to say ?

and for me the quantifiers look the same.
(Vx ∈ Z) a-> b is same as (Vx ∈ Z) a -> (Vx ∈ Z)b

I don't understand the question at all.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Demonoid said:
I'm a little stuck with these bad boys:

Let P(x) be the assertion “x is odd”, and let Q(x) be the assertion “x is twice an integer.” Determine whether the following statements are true:

1. (Vx ∈ Z)(P(x) ⇒ Q(x))
2. (Vx ∈ Z)(P(x)) ⇒ (Vx ∈ Z)(Q(x))

My attempt:

I don't get the statement at all; if x is odd then 2x ? maybe if x is odd then 2x is even ?
Is that what they're trying to say ?

and for me the quantifiers look the same.
(Vx ∈ Z) a-> b is same as (Vx ∈ Z) a -> (Vx ∈ Z)b

I don't understand the question at all.

Intuitively they both look like they are false, but can you remind me what the condition is for implication in terms of union and intersection of sets?
 
Demonoid said:
I'm a little stuck with these bad boys:

Let P(x) be the assertion “x is odd”, and let Q(x) be the assertion “x is twice an integer.” Determine whether the following statements are true:

1. (Vx ∈ Z)(P(x) ⇒ Q(x))
2. (Vx ∈ Z)(P(x)) ⇒ (Vx ∈ Z)(Q(x))

My attempt:

I don't get the statement at all; if x is odd then 2x ? maybe if x is odd then 2x is even ?
Is that what they're trying to say ?

and for me the quantifiers look the same.
(Vx ∈ Z) a-> b is same as (Vx ∈ Z) a -> (Vx ∈ Z)b

I don't understand the question at all.

I doubt if my response below says anything that your textbook/professor hasn't said, so your misunderstanding seems likely to be a symptom of a lack of reading/listening (and thinking about what you've read/heard). Learning to read/listen to mathematics takes work, but is invaluable (even outside of mathematics). In my explanations below, I recommend that whenever I ask a question, you refrain from reading the next sentence until you've tried to answer the question on your own.

I assume Z represents the set of integers; i.e. Z = {...-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...}.

Statement 1. should be read "for all x in the integers, if x is odd, then x is twice an integer". Is that true? Intuitively, it should be clear that the given statement is asking whether every odd integer is twice another integer, so to check it's truth you need to either prove it or find a counterexample. You might want to start by checking a few odd integers to see if they're twice another integer.

Although statement 1 is easy to interpret, the important thing we should be able to do is parse the statement to check for validity. This will be especially important in statement 2.

Statement 2. should be read "If, for all x in the integers, x is odd; then for all x in the integers, x is twice an integer". When beginning to parse this statement, the first thing to notice is that the sub-statements (Vx ∈ Z)(P(x)) and (Vx ∈ Z)(Q(x)) are separated by an implication arrow, so we essentially have a A ⇒ B type statement. How do we check if such a statement holds? Well, a statement A ⇒ B is true in all cases except one: when A is true yet B is false. So we need to check the validity of A and B separately. If we happen to find that A is false, then we don't even have to worry about B because the single case where A ⇒ B can be false is impossible. Is (Vx ∈ Z)(P(x)) true? What does that statement mean? It means "for every x in the integers, x is odd". Is that true? If not, you're done. If so, proceed to checking what (Vx ∈ Z)(Q(x)) means and determining its truth value.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top