Understanding Melting Points for the Periodic Table

  • Thread starter Thread starter komal12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Melting Points
AI Thread Summary
Melting points of ionic compounds like NaF, NaCl, NaBr, and NaI vary due to the nature of their ionic lattices rather than just bond strength. NaF has the highest melting point because it forms a tightly packed lattice with similar-sized ions, making it harder to separate. As the size difference between ions increases from NaF to NaI, the melting points decrease due to less efficient packing in the lattice structure. The discussion emphasizes that while bond energy is relevant, lattice structure plays a more critical role in determining melting points. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the behavior of elements in the periodic table.
komal12
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hi

i am having a hard understanding melting points from my textbook. can someone please explain to me how they work and how you can determine melting points in the periodic table?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone help me with this:

element solubility in water Melting

NaF 0.042 988
NaCl 0.357 801
NaBr 1.16 755
NaI 1.84 651

Explain the decreasing melting point from NaF to NaI?

I think it has to do with covalent and ionic bonds...because NaF is ionic it has a higher because its harder to pull the electrons apart and NaI more covalent so it has a lower melting point...am i close please help..!
 
Last edited:
Yeah, youre on the right track.
 
komal12 said:
Can anyone help me with this:

element solubility in water Melting

NaF 0.042 988
NaCl 0.357 801
NaBr 1.16 755
NaI 1.84 651

Explain the decreasing melting point from NaF to NaI?

I think it has to do with covalent and ionic bonds...because NaF is ionic it has a higher because its harder to pull the electrons apart and NaI more covalent so it has a lower melting point...am i close please help..!

No, you are not on the right track...

Bond energy tracks with ionic/covalent character but melting point is more related to the nature of the lattice that makes up the material. Neat, tightly packed lattices with equal size anions and cations will have a higher melting point than one with ions of different sizes. This is more important to melting point than the bond strength.

http://www.Newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem00/chem00800.htm
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top