Understanding momentum concept

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maisara-WD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Momentum is a fundamental concept introduced to explain the behavior of moving bodies, particularly in scenarios where forces are absent, allowing for uniform motion. It addresses limitations of energy conservation alone, especially in collisions where kinetic energy may not be conserved. Momentum is a vector quantity, providing additional information about direction and interactions that energy alone cannot convey. The introduction of momentum expands the understanding of physical systems, enabling predictions in complex interactions like collisions. Overall, momentum is essential for a comprehensive grasp of motion and conservation laws in physics.
Maisara-WD
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello

Please, if you UNDERSTAND WHAT IS MOMENTUM, tell me.

I want to know, why do I need momentum, why was this concept introduced. If I were an ancient scientist, what's the problem that faced me in absence of such concept, that lead me to devising it, and at which basis did I choose my independent variables, mass and velocity.

Thanks in Advance..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've forgot to say:

Mu readings have lead me that the concept was introduced in order to account for the uniform motion (assume it's space with no resistances), that a body makes although the physical interaction causing it to move disappeared.

I still don't get it, I think the answer is simply because that body has a kinetic energy! and energy is conserved, there's no resistance, no consumption, let the body move because of its energy.. why momentum?? why to think that energy interpretation is not enough, and that I need another sufficiently explaining concept?
 
Maisara-WD said:
I still don't get it, I think the answer is simply because that body has a kinetic energy! and energy is conserved, there's no resistance, no consumption, let the body move because of its energy.. why momentum?? why to think that energy interpretation is not enough, and that I need another sufficiently explaining concept?
There are many cases where mechanical energy is not conserved, yet momentum is

Momentum is also a vector quantity, kinetic energy is not.
 
Let's say it's conserved, WHY to introduce a new concept? is just because of the scalar nature of energy quantities?
 
Maisara-WD said:
Let's say it's conserved, WHY to introduce a new concept?
Any time you can introduce a new quantity that is conserved it expands your power to understand the world. Take the simplest case: A ball collides with another at rest. Assuming kinetic energy is conserved doesn't allow you to predict what will happen. Adding momentum conservation does.
 
That's acceptable :D

Thanks ALOT :)
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top