Understanding Momentum Transfer as a Tensor in Newton's Law of Viscosity

AI Thread Summary
Momentum transfer in fluids is described as a tensor rather than a vector, indicating a more complex interaction involving nine components: three normal stresses and six shear stresses. This distinction arises from the molecular diffusion process, where momentum is transferred between fluid layers, resulting in shear forces related to viscosity. Understanding this tensorial nature of stress is crucial for analyzing fluid behavior under various conditions. The discussion highlights the importance of grasping tensor analysis to bridge the gap between basic physics and advanced mathematical concepts. Mastery of these principles can significantly enhance comprehension of fluid dynamics and related phenomena.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
What does it mean by momentum transfer is not a vector (3 components) but rather a tensor (9 components)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
asdf1 said:
What does it mean by momentum transfer is not a vector (3 components) but rather a tensor (9 components)?

"momentum transfer"? Can you elaborate?
 
Newton says that viscosity is due to molecular diffusion between layers in the fluid. A molecule leaves one layer and transfers it's momentum to the adjoining layer. That transfer creates an acceleration and that acceleration creates shear forces which is related to the viscosity.

Stresses in the most basic forms, i.e. no simplifying assumptions, are tensors. There are nine components 3 normal stresses and 6 shear stresses (note that for equillibrium, the 6 shear stresses are 2 groups of 3 that are equal, \tau_{xy} = \tau_{yx}).

You might like to read up on tensors by taking a look at this thread that Astronuc created in the tutorial section:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=101414
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the link to the tutorial, Fred. Cool stuff.

Tensor analysis is the type of subject that can make even the best of students shudder. My own post-graduate instructor in the subject took away much of the fear by speaking of an implicit rhythm in the peculiar notation traditionally used, and helped us to see how this rhythm plays its way throughout the various formalisms. Prior to taking that class, I had spent many years “playing” on my own with tensors. I found the going to be tremendously difficult but was able, over time, to back out some physical and geometrical considerations that helped to make the subject a little more transparent. Today, it is sometimes hard not to think in terms of tensors and their associated concepts. This article, prompted and greatly enhanced by Marlos Jacob, whom I’ve met only by e-mail, is an attempt to record those early notions concerning tensors. It is intended to serve as a bridge from the point where most undergraduate students “leave off” in their studies of mathematics to the place where most texts on tensor analysis begin. A basic knowledge of vectors, matrices, and physics is assumed. A semi-intuitive approach to those notions underlying tensor analysis is given via scalars, vectors, dyads, triads, and higher vector products. The reader must be prepared to do some mathematics and to think. For those students who wish to go beyond this humble start, I can only recommend my professor’s wisdom: find the rhythm in the mathematics and you will fare pretty well.
 
thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top