Understanding Multiple Delta Function in 1D and Multidimensional Spaces

fuwuchen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I have trouble understanding the multiple delta function. For one dimensional delta function, we have
δ(\varphi(x))=\sum_{i=1}^{N}δ(x−xi)|\varphi′(xi)|
where xi's (for i = 1 to N) are simple zeros of f(x) and it is known that f(x) has no zeros of multiplicitiy > 1

but what is the case of multiple delta function
δ(f(x,y))=?

PS:This my first time to this forum, I'm not familiar with Latex. Sorry for the caused inconvenience.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well one thing you could do is to treat y as a parameter and f(x,y) as a function of one variable. Then the zeroes of f(x,y) occur at x = ξi(y), and you have δ(f(x,y)) = ∑ δ(x - ξi(y)) |[∂f(x,y)/∂x]x = ξi(y)|.
 
Bill_K said:
Well one thing you could do is to treat y as a parameter and f(x,y) as a function of one variable. Then the zeroes of f(x,y) occur at x = ξi(y), and you have δ(f(x,y)) = ∑ δ(x - ξi(y)) |[∂f(x,y)/∂x]x = ξi(y)|.


Thank a lot for your help, Bill!

But I wonder whether we can treat y as a parameter and have x = ξi(y), as in f(x,y) the two arguments x and y are independent to each other.
 
Sure, that's perfectly legal. You will often see this approach used when dealing with the delta function on the light cone δ(x2 - c2t2). Instead of calling it a function of two variables f(x, t) = x2 - c2t2, we define a parameter a = ct and work with a function of one variable, δ(x2 - a2). By the one-dimensional rule this is equal to |1/2a| (δ(x - a) + δ(x + a)), which can then be written |1/2ct| (δ(x - ct) + δ(x + ct)).
 
Bill_K said:
Sure, that's perfectly legal. You will often see this approach used when dealing with the delta function on the light cone δ(x2 - c2t2). Instead of calling it a function of two variables f(x, t) = x2 - c2t2, we define a parameter a = ct and work with a function of one variable, δ(x2 - a2). By the one-dimensional rule this is equal to |1/2a| (δ(x - a) + δ(x + a)), which can then be written |1/2ct| (δ(x - ct) + δ(x + ct)).

Yes, you are right!
Thanks again for your help, good luck with you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top