Understanding Neutron Beta Decay: The Role of W Boson and Energies Involved

chis
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Most accepted theories make sense, but the energies involved in the beta decay of a neutron into a proton confuses me.
How can a down quark change into an up quark by emiting an electron and an anti electron neutrino via a w boson, the figures don't add up!
Using the figures of mass it goes like this:

Neutron 939ish Mev
Down Quark 4.8 Mev

Wboson 80Gev

Electron .511 Mev
Electron Neutrino 2.2 ev

Up Quark 2.4 Mev

Proton 938 Mev

My question is - Where does the Wboson Get so much energy from?

Thanks
Chris
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The W boson is virtual, so its effective mass is given by E^2-p^2, where E and p come from conservation of 4-momentum. This is not the W rest mass.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top