Understanding of projectiles from physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding projectile motion in the context of Extension 2 mathematics for Australian high school students. The original poster seeks a crash course due to missed classes and an upcoming test, highlighting their existing knowledge of basic projectile concepts like horizontal and vertical components. Key advice includes mastering the relationships between time, position, velocity, and acceleration, particularly through different forms of expressing acceleration. Participants suggest using textbooks for examples and emphasize the importance of carefully reading questions to relate known variables to those required. Overall, the conversation aims to provide clarity and support for mastering projectile mechanics.
Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
I was unfortunate enough to have sports on the days of my mechanics classes so I've basically missed most if not all of the basics of this topic, and a test is coming up shortly.

What I need is a crash course on this topic. Extension 2 mathematics (Australian high school) on mechanics (projectiles in resistive mediums, pendulums etc.).

I already have a basic understanding of projectiles from physics and extension 1 maths, such as the horizontal and vertical components, displacement, velocity and acceleration etc.

I know a few formulas thus far such as:

w=\frac{d\theta}{dt}

v=rw

a=\frac{v^2}{r}

If you guys have any tips on the basic procedures required to solve each type of question, I would really appreciate it. I'll also be asking questions in the homework forum, without much attempt, because I'm seriously lost on all this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Wow I've seen you on the forums for so long and didn't even realize! I'm doing Ext2 Maths as well, I just had my trial this week!

Well if you have a couple of days, you can still cover it all in time. Start with resisted motion. The key is knowing the relations between the variables - time, position, velocity and acceleration.

You need to know the three forms to express acceleration:

a = \frac{dv}{dt} = v \frac{dv}{dx} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{dv}{dx}.
These allow to to describe the motion as functions of position as well as time. The key is to read the question carefully and express the information you have in the form that relates the variables know to the variables required.

If you want, get one of your textbooks and I'll help you though some examples and questions.
 


Oh wow you're doing ext2 maths? Your profile makes it seem like you're well into university already. (linear algebra, real and complex analysis?), I admire your ability to go ahead enough so that you can enjoy the topic. I attempted to learn linear algebra through the MIT lectures on youtube once... it was horrific by the 3rd lecture! There's no way one can understand everything just through lectures.

Thanks I'll keep those equations in mind, and I think you meant a=\frac{1}{2}\frac{d(v^2)}{dx} :smile:

I'll post links in here to the homework section, for ease.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top