Understanding Parametric Equations: Conflicting Answers Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter phalanx123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differentiation of parametric equations, specifically addressing the conflicting results when evaluating the derivative \(\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{4\sin(4\theta)}{\sin\theta}\) at \(\theta = 0\). Substituting directly leads to an indeterminate form \(\frac{0}{0}\), which does not equate to infinity, but rather indicates the need for further analysis. The correct approach involves using L'Hôpital's rule or a trigonometric substitution to find the limit as \(\theta\) approaches zero, yielding a value of 16. It is emphasized that derivatives may not be defined at certain points, but limits can provide meaningful values at those points. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between indeterminate forms and actual values in calculus.
phalanx123
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
two conflicting answers?

I was doing a question on differentiate parametric equations which has this result \frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{4sin(4\theta)}{sin\theta}. it then asks what the value of \frac{dy}{dx}would be if \theta=0. if I substitute \theta=0 into \frac{4sin(4\theta)}{sin\theta} than I get \frac{0}{0} which I persume would be infinity, i.e. the grdient of the graph at that point is undefinined. but if I transform \frac{4sin(4\theta)}{sin\theta} into 16cos\theta cos(4\theta) and substitute\theta=0 in than I got 16 which is the correct answer. How can this be possible?:confused:
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I guess the simplest answer would be that 0/0 doesn't mean infinity. In your case, it essentially means 'try harder' -- use L'Hopital's rule, or a trig substitution, to solve.
 
Many trig Identities arise from assumptions that the value ie \sin \theta does not equal zero. If you look at the proofs, many involve divisions which are not possible when it equals zero. Basically when you transformed it you worked out the limit as it approaches zero, as you let theta become an infinitesimal instead of exactly zero, which some picky mathematicians may say are equivalent but you get what i mean.
 
No, 0/0 is not "infinity"- it is "undetermined". If you are actually given that dy/dx= sin(4x)/sin(x) then the simple answer is that dy/dx is not defined at x= 0. If however, you are given that the dy/dx= sin(4x)/sin(x) for x not equal to 0 and that dy/dx is defined at x= 0, take the limit of dy/dx as x goes to 0. (Derivatives are not necessarily continuous but the do satisfy the "intermediate value property" and so if the limit exists the derivative must be equal to that limit.) An easy application of L'Hopital's rule gives 16 as the value just as you say.

Gib Z, I don't know any mathematicians, picky or not, who say "infinitesmal is the same as zero". I do know that defining "infinitesmal" is a very picky problem and I would not recommend it to undergraduates.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top