Understanding Poisson's Equation: General Forms

  • Thread starter Thread starter OllyRutts
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the general form of Poisson's equation, with participants questioning whether different expressions can both be considered valid general forms. There is a debate about the aesthetics and clarity of the notation used, particularly regarding the term εε₀ versus ε = εᵣε₀. The context of the discussion involves a linear isotropic homogeneous (LIH) dielectric material, with references to Gauss's law and free charge density. Participants agree that multiple forms can be appropriate for the general expression of Poisson's equation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in notation and the flexibility in defining general forms.
OllyRutts
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble determining what the general form of Poisson's equation would be between

upload_2017-11-22_13-10-41.png

and

upload_2017-11-22_13-12-50.png


Can they both be called the general form?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-22_13-10-41.png
    upload_2017-11-22_13-10-41.png
    462 bytes · Views: 935
  • upload_2017-11-22_13-10-59.png
    upload_2017-11-22_13-10-59.png
    462 bytes · Views: 575
  • upload_2017-11-22_13-12-50.png
    upload_2017-11-22_13-12-50.png
    411 bytes · Views: 974
Physics news on Phys.org
The 'general form' has not been trademarked or anything. One could equally well claim that ##\ \Delta\phi = f \ ## is the general form.

I do wonder where you got this form from: I find ##\varepsilon\varepsilon_0## very ugly (I am used to ## \varepsilon=\varepsilon_r\varepsilon_0## ) and I don't know where the ##f## in your first expression comes from.
 
BvU said:
The 'general form' has not been trademarked or anything. One could equally well claim that ##\ \Delta\phi = f \ ## is the general form.

I do wonder where you got this form from: I find ##\varepsilon\varepsilon_0## very ugly (I am used to ## \varepsilon=\varepsilon_r\varepsilon_0## ) and I don't know where the ##f## in your first expression comes from.

I should have said this relates to a LIH dielectric material
pf is the free charge density
I guess the textbook I am using is using for gauss's law in terms of D=\varepsilon\varepsilon_0E

So any is appropriate for the general form?
 
I should say so, yes.

tip: use ## [ ...##\TeX ## code ] ## as ##\LaTeX## delimiters to get ##{\bf D} =\varepsilon\varepsilon_0 {\bf E} ##

and use subscripts to distinguish factors from, well, subscripts.
 
Thanks much appreciated.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top