Understanding Polarisation of Light: Dextrorotary vs Laevorotary Explained

AI Thread Summary
Polarisation of light involves the orientation of light waves, which can be affected by various substances. Dextrorotary refers to light that rotates clockwise, while laevorotary indicates counterclockwise rotation. Visual aids, such as diagrams, are beneficial for understanding these concepts, particularly in illustrating rotating polarization. A recommended resource for further clarification is HyperPhysics, which provides helpful diagrams and explanations. Understanding these terms enhances comprehension of light behavior in different contexts.
charlee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How does polarisation of light work exactly and what does dextrorotary and
laevorotary mean please help :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
charlee said:
How does polarisation of light work exactly and what does dextrorotary and
laevorotary mean please help :smile:

I had never seen those words before, but I looked them up. They mean rotating right and left.

It really helps to have some nice diagrams to explain polarization, especially rotating polarization. there are some nice diagrams, and a decent explanation here.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/polclas.html#c3
 
Thank you, the website was helpful and the definitions of those words meant the explanation in the book made more sense
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top