Understanding Polarization: Reflection and Refraction at a Water-Glass Interface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Supertramp19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization
Supertramp19
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A beam of unpolarized light (III=IP= I0 and EII= EP= E0) is incident from air on a plane interface of water (n = 1.33).

(a) Under the incident angle of θi = 0°, 30°, and 70°, what is the amplitude (E) and intensity (I) of the reflected beam (relative to the values E0 and I0 of the incident beam) for the two E parts of the light, polarized II and to the plane of incidence?

(b) At what particular angle of incidence will you achieve total linear polarization for the reflected light?

(c) The light refracted into the water in (b) is intercepted by the top flat surface of a block of glass (n = 1.6), which is immersed in the water. The light reflected from the glass back into the water is completely linearly polarized. What is the angle between the glass and water surface?

(d) Plot both particular cases (b) and (c) together in a sketch of the plane of incidence showing the directions of the incident, reflected, and transmitted light beams, and also the polarization direction of the reflected light. Include in your sketch the arrangement ofthe glass block relative to the
water surface. You need not consider any reflections at the bottom of the glass block.

Note: II means parallel and P means perpendicular.

I know it's a lot to ask. Thanks for any help/hints in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show work?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top