Understanding Polarization: Solving a Problem with the Law of Malus

  • Thread starter Thread starter muirontriton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a polarization problem involving two polarizers at a 30-degree angle, with the second polarizer aligned to the incoming polarized light. The Law of Malus is applied to calculate the intensity after passing through both polarizers. The initial calculation yields a result of approximately 0.49, which is questioned against the expected answer of 1/2. Confusion arises regarding the interpretation of the incoming light's polarization and its effect on the calculations. Ultimately, the consensus is that the correct answer remains 1/2, despite the complexities in understanding the setup.
muirontriton
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I was wondering if any of you guys can tell me whether or not I did the following polarization problem correct.

Problem:
Polarized light passes through a sequence of two polarizers whose axis of polarization forms a 30 degree angle. The second polarizer has the same polarization as the incoming light before it hits the first polarizer. What fraction if the incident intensity emerges from the set of polarizers?

The answer is 1/2.

My attempt:
I used the Law of Malus:
S = S(i)*cos^2(θ)

So I did this:

cos^3(30) * cos^2(30) * S(i) = S

The cos^3(30) comes from the average of the first two polarizers. As for the second part, I am not sure. I assumed that the problem says the angle is still 30° after the light goes through the first two. In the end, I get .49, which is close to the answer. However, I feel strongly that what I did is completely wrong. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That cos^3 is what is messing you up.

You know that the first polarizer brings it down to a fraction of .75.

Now how can you bring it down another 2/3?

I honestly don't know myself - there are no even angles that when put into cos^2 equal 2/3. I could be horribly wrong, but are you sure the answer is 1/2?
 
Last edited:
The answer is still 1/2.

What does it mean by "the second polarizer has the same polarization as the incoming light before it hits the first polarizer?"
 
http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/kap24/polarizers/Polarizer.htm

Look at this applet. Change it to the two polarizer setting. Rotate the first polarizer 30 degrees (so 60 or 120 degrees, doesn't matter which). As far as I can tell, this is the situation described. That's why I'm confused. It's not 1/2. Maybe I'm wrong.

To answer your question, I'm pretty confident that that means it is at the same angle as the incoming light.
 
But this is with a beam of unpolarized light entering the polarizers. The light entering the polarizers is polarized. I used the applet and set the two polarizers to 30 degrees, and I got an intensity of 50%. That would make sense, but the light coming in is polarized, so wouldn't that lead a different approach?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top