Understanding Power Factor and Utility Penalties

  • Thread starter Thread starter XPTPCREWX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Power factor
AI Thread Summary
Utilities penalize customers for low power factor because it indicates inefficient energy use, leading to increased current draw without corresponding real power output. This excess current causes higher energy losses in the distribution system, necessitating larger infrastructure and increasing operational costs for the utility. Reactive power does not perform useful work, yet it still contributes to the overall load, resulting in penalties for industrial and commercial users. The additional current leads to joule heating losses and voltage drops, which are not compensated for by the utility. Overall, maintaining a higher power factor is essential for reducing costs and improving system efficiency.
XPTPCREWX
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Why is it that the utility will penalize a customer for a low power factor.

I can't imagine why they would penalize you if a purely reactive load puts all its power back into the mains.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Because it doesn't put all its power back into the grid. Reactive power has no capacity to do work because the voltage and current are out of phase with each other. So essentially, when you take reactive power, you are taking generator capacity (apparent power) that isn't showing up on your meter (real power).
In an electric power system, a load with low power factor draws more current than a load with a high power factor for the same amount of useful power transferred. The higher currents increase the energy lost in the distribution system, and require larger wires and other equipment. Because of the costs of larger equipment and wasted energy, electrical utilities will usually charge a higher cost to industrial or commercial customers where there is a low power factor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_factor
 
A purely reactive load still draws current and gives rise to undesirable joule heating losses and voltage drops in the power distribution network conductors and components (such as transformer windings). That loss is not recoverable. Allowing very low power factor conditions to prevail could require the system to have much bigger conductor sizes to reduce the losses and voltage drop - thereby increasing the capital cost.
 
XPTPCREWX said:
Why is it that the utility will penalize a customer for a low power factor. I can't imagine why they would penalize you if a purely reactive load puts all its power back into the mains.
You are correct. A low power factor puts more current in the lines. The utility charges you only for real power, not the reactive part. The extra current in their lines just loads them down with extra I2R losses, which you do not pay for. On the other hand, they may pay YOU for some capacitive power factor. You could put a synchronous capacitor on line (a salient pole synchronous motor w/o load).
 
Because power is wasted in the wires carrying current to the load. Do a search on this. It has been covered here on PF numerous times.

Edit: WOW. Three posts within minutes of each other.
 
had a feeling that, that was the reason, but wasn't sure...thanx
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top