I Understanding QM Proof: Wavefunction in Orthonormal Eigenfunctions

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I have a proof in my QM book that: ##\left<r|e^{-iHt}|r'\right> = \sum_j e^{-iHt} u_j(r)u_j^*(r')##, where, for a wavefunction ##\psi(r,t)##, ##u_j## 's are the orthonormal eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian and ##|r>## is the coordinate space representation of ##\psi##. I am not sure I understand this. Like in general ##\psi = \sum_j a_j u_j## and I don't know where the ##a_j##'s disappeared. Also I am not sure what is the relation between ##u_j(r)## and ##u_j(r')##. Is there any formula linking them? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have a look at the following and check if you understand it. Note what happens with the exponent - you got this wrong in your post.
##
\begin{eqnarray*}
\langle r|e^{-iHt}|r'\rangle &=& \langle r|e^{-iHt} \left( \sum_j |E_j\rangle \langle E_j| \right) |r'\rangle\\
&=& \langle r| \sum_j e^{-iHt} |E_j\rangle \langle E_j |r'\rangle\\
&=& \langle r| \sum_j e^{-iE_jt} |E_j\rangle \langle E_j |r'\rangle\\
&=& \sum_j e^{-iE_jt} \langle r|E_j\rangle \langle E_j|r' \rangle\\
&=& \sum_j e^{-iE_jt} u_j(r) u_j^{*}(r')
\end{eqnarray*}
##
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and BvU
kith said:
Have a look at the following and check if you understand it. Note what happens with the exponent - you got this wrong in your post.
##
\begin{eqnarray*}
\langle r|e^{-iHt}|r'\rangle &=& \langle r|e^{-iHt} \left( \sum_j |E_j\rangle \langle E_j| \right) |r'\rangle\\
&=& \langle r| \sum_j e^{-iHt} |E_j\rangle \langle E_j |r'\rangle\\
&=& \langle r| \sum_j e^{-iE_jt} |E_j\rangle \langle E_j |r'\rangle\\
&=& \sum_j e^{-iE_jt} \langle r|E_j\rangle \langle E_j|r' \rangle\\
&=& \sum_j e^{-iE_jt} u_j(r) u_j^{*}(r')
\end{eqnarray*}
##
Thank you for your reply. I understand the logic of it. However I am a bit confused. From what I see ##\|E_j>## is an eigenfunction of the hamiltonian, but ##u_j## is that, too. What is the difference between them?
 
|E_j \rangle is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, i.e. it is a vector in Hilbert space.

u_j(r) = \langle r | E_j \rangle is a representation of the state |E_j \rangle which uses the position basis. You can use many different bases to represent the same state vector. \tilde u_j(p) = \langle p | E_j \rangle for example uses the momentum basis and refers to the same state |E_j \rangle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top