Understanding Quantum State Preparation: The Significance of |u> and |d> Vectors

Quarlep
Messages
257
Reaction score
4
"Let’s begin by labeling the possible spin states along the three coordinate axes. If A is oriented along the z axis, the two possible states that can be prepared correspond to σz= ±1. Let’s call them up and down and denote them by ket-vectors |u> and |d> . Thus, when the apparatus is oriented along the z axis and registers +1, the state |u> has been prepared. " says in The Theoritical Minimum

what it means ? In particular "the state |u> has been prepared" Actually I am asking just this part
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that the system is in state |u>,
$$
| \psi \rangle = | \mathrm{u} \rangle
$$
 
By saying that the state |u\rangle is prepared, one can assume that all subsequent measurements of that same system will be as though the system is in state |u\rangle.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top